User talk:Schekanov

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Schekanov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account is blocked. What did I do?

Decline reason:

Well, a few years ago, you used both this account, and your User:Tsma73 account, to argue on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DataMelt. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 02:57, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your edit to Jhepwork

Message posted on Friday, June 8, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Jhepwork. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://freshmeat.net/projects/jhepwork/?branch_id=68494&release_id=253027 in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Jhepwork with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Jhepwork with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Jhepwork saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Butseriouslyfolks 02:32, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page JHepWork worked, and it has been automatically reverted. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here. Thank you.
SoxBot III (talk | owner) 02:02, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article jHepWork, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. Qwfp (talk) 19:05, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tedickey (talk) 08:13, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Tedickey (talk) 22:36, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RTextDoc for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RTextDoc is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RTextDoc until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TEDickey (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SCaViS & DataMelt

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give SCaViS a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into DataMelt. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Qwfp (talk) 06:06, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. TEDickey (talk) 00:05, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sign your comments, and format them properly, please.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you.

Please learn to use basic Wikipedia formatting, such as using : appropriately for threaded discussions on talk pages. It is impolite if you ignore basic Wikipedia best practices like this. HelpUsStopSpam (talk) 11:47, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Don't blame the messenger!

I know that you blame me for the article being deleted.

But while I had added the initial "COI" warning, you may want to notice that I neither nominated it for deletion, nor do I have the capacity to actually delete articles - only administrators can delete articles, and it followed the established Wikipedia procedures, that just had not yet been applied to the article before. I repeatedly tried to help you understand which kind of sources are going to be accepted as supporting notability (that German article seemed good), and which sources are considered to be not independent and low quality (copy and paste from your homepage). But rather than following the well meant advice to focus on quality references, you were very aggressive, and that may have backfired to some extend (although the deletion was because of WP:GNG and lack of reliable sources, not because of aggressive behavior). HelpUsStopSpam (talk) 11:42, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As for why your article was nominated for deletion, see this archived discussion: Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive_766#DataMelt (no involvement from my side either, but supporting my point of view: "like an advertisement for a new product", "suggestive of a COI violation"). HelpUsStopSpam (talk) 11:48, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of DataMelt program

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on DataMelt program, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here.

Don't play stupid games with us like this renaming game. You know: we've seen this before. Often enough to have templates for this case. Such childish games will just get you permanently banned. HelpUsStopSpam (talk) 22:33, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RunMC for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RunMC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RunMC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- RoySmith (talk) 16:01, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]