User talk:Scandrett

I fear that you may want to revisit your latin books. While it is true that most verbs come at the end of their clause (not that they do if you're reading Cato or a hundred other pre/post classical authors), this is absolutely untrue for copulatives. A est B, non, quaeso, ORO, A B est... I assure you, no one ran the Mehmet page through any Babelfish or anything else. To say so impunes the collective knowledge of Vicipaedia, and the vigilance of its editors/admins.--Ioshus^(talk) 20:55, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't stick to your own language! Better yet, come learn more!--Ioshus^(talk) 22:44, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 22:20, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA violation at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Tom ap Rhys Pryce

Please do not make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Tom ap Rhys Pryce where you said " Also, consider comments like those of Edison unhelpful, ad hominem, and ill-informed." Wikipedia has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Please read and follow WP:NPA, WP:AGF, and WP:CIVILITY.Thank you. Edison 20:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Wikipedia talk:Notability (news)

In the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Tom ap Rhys Pryce in which you participated, some editors suggested the need for a guideline where a consensus could be reached regarding whether everything which is newsworthy is also encyclopedic. I have created a draft of a proposed guideline Wikipedia talk:Notability (news). Your input is welcome. Thanks. Edison 15:33, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]