User talk:Sbwinter2

Talkback

Hello, Sbwinter2. You have new messages at Talk:List of generic and genericized trademarks.
Message added 19:23, 23 February 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hi Suggest looking at http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:OTRS - that seems to be the place for copyright etc. SmithBlue (talk) 10:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:58, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I thought that was supposed to happen automatically if I was signed in. I see my sigs on my edits. Sbwinter2 (talk) 21:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits at Rolfing

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Alexbrn ^{talk|contribs|COI} 22:11, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I just want to share what it feels like to someone who does not work for wikipedia. And this may sound blunt, but it is not meant to be directed at you, but just reflect what I have felt throughout this process.

We are told we can make changes to anything (which isn't as easy as it sounds). We make a change and then almost immediately, someone deletes it without contact or comment. So we think something went wrong, and we make the change again. Again it is reversed. So we try again and again because we have no idea why some random person is reversing changes and not providing any sort of explanation at all. That sums up the problem to me. It is really the editors who are engaging in the editing war because they reverse changes and do not reach out, like you did here (although I did not even know you did until today since I don't get an email whenever someone posts to my page, or any page I have touched - wish I did), or give any rationality as to why the change was reverted back. How would the someone on the outside understand what is even going on?

What would really be helpful is if the person reversing the change could reach out and introduce themselves as an actual editor whose job it is to monitor that page. As well, if they could explain the problem and indicate why they had to remove the edit, then the person who posted would not keep trying again and again thinking it is just some troll trying to make trouble instead of an actual person who has authentic concern for the page content.

The more "mistakes" I make, the more I learn about the process. There is no way I could have assumed anything that I have had to learn the hard way. The process is that opaque. As well, I have tried the Talk pages, but have got little response, at times, to many of my questions, so that is not always the best route for trying to understand why an edit was reversed. I have also observed a lot of inconsistency of enforcement on page monitoring, as well as a lot of condescending attitude in some of the responses, as if no one should be editing the pages except for a select few. That seems opposite of wikipedia's advertised policy.

I really like wikipedia. I even donate a little money to the cause. I want to help fix incorrect info if I see it and add where I can as I can, but I wish the whole environment was more welcoming instead of threatening.

Thanks for listening. Sbwinter2 (talk) 20:55, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Sbwinter2! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! MrBill3 (talk) 06:57, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Remaining anonymous

It appears that you have forgotten to log in a number of times recently. You can click the "Stay logged in for 30 days" so that you do not have to remember each time you edit.

If you wish to remain anonymous and not have your IP address linked to your account, you can contact the WP:OTRS and request that they remove the edits you made while not logged in. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:20, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It wasn't intentional. I actually fixed any of them immediately afterwards so that my signature actually does appear by my comments. If you look, you will see all of my comments are signed correctly.

What is happening is that it still shows me as logged in at the top until I press the save page button, and then it makes me log in again. I actually don't even realize I am not logged in until that point. Then I have to go back to the edit tab and erase the anonymous signature so I can add my own.

It is really a pain, but keeps happening to me on a few different computers (Mac and PC with cookies enabled) within the same hour, or sometimes even same 15 minutes when I haven't even left the page (I will start writing something and then come back to it five minutes later, and think I am still logged in, but I guess I timed out and didn't know it). Any suggestions?Sbwinter2 (talk) 15:49, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It just happened again, although I wasn't in edit mode yet. If I refresh the page I am on, it shows me as still being logged in. It isn't until I go to another page that it shows I actually am not. And it isn't taking me to to a login screen, but just the same page with the Login link at the top. Now I just check every time I touch anything. Sbwinter2 (talk) 15:06, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest checking WP:HELP to see if this has been a problem for others and to (hopefully) find a solution. This sounds like a pain and as you continue to edit, making sure you are logged in is very important as well as helping preserve your anonymity. - - MrBill3 (talk) 13:12, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback re: Talk:Rolfing

Hello, Sbwinter2. You have new messages at Talk:Rolfing.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

- - MrBill3 (talk) 13:14, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sbwinter2. You have new messages at MrBill3's talk page.
Message added 01:41, 10 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Merrily We Roll Along (musical)

Hi SB, if I may abbreviate! The synopsis you added to this article appears to be copyrighted, according to https://www.sonymusic.com/terms-and-conditions/. That's from Sony and seems like a page wrapper footer for masterworksbroadway.com, so if you have the content as freely published elsewhere outside that wrapper, please advise so we can tag the source accordingly. If not, it will have to be removed as a copyright violation. Thanks, Crow^Caw 19:44, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. So I have seen the original. Since the 1994 description has no reference (clearly just written by someone), if I can't find something else, and just end up doing that, would that be ok? I think it is important to include a description of the original since it is so different in meaningful ways. On the webpage, the actual attribution is to a specific person. I will first see who that person is.--Sbwinter2 (talk) 02:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Sbwinter2: Hi, I saw you message today, sorry I've been away for a bit. If you write the description in your own words, using the source as a reference, then that's perfect. Just be sure to cite the source which it looks like you do anyway. As long as the content is in your own words, then its fine to use a copyrighted source, which is the way most content here is done. Regarding your message on my talk page, to let someone know you've responded to them, just do {{ping|Crow}} and it will pop a red message in the browser. I did that for this message, which you can see if you edit the page. Any questions, feel free to ask! Crow^Caw 19:08, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]