User talk:Sbstn

Welcome!

Hello, Sbstn, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Spellcast (talk) 16:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: 212.117.165.197 or steinsel.perfect-privacy.com

Hi, I can't find any blocks on that IP, but I still think IPs from that service should be blocked because it acts as an anonymizer by hiding your normal address. If you find yourself blocked again, you can post an unblock request by adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below and request for IP block exemption. Thanks, Spellcast (talk) 16:11, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply, Spellcast. Every edit page still tells me I'm blocked by you until 05:09, 6 January 2014. I'm appending the unblock request below. Sbstn (talk) 16:22, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sbstn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I would like my IP 212.117.165.197 to be unblocked from editing when logged in for the following reasons: Due to excessive data retention and eavesdropping policies recently implemented by the government of my home country on the one hand, nosy neighbours on the unencrypted WIFI Network I often have to use on the other hand, I heavily depend on privacy services like the one the above IP belongs to. With more and more countries implementing policies as mentioned above worldwide, I believe it is safe to say that privacy services will become much more widespread in the near future. I would love to contribute to Wikipedia more often. Having to disable my VPN connection as well as my Email-Client, Browser, Messaging programms etc, in order to edit each small mistake I find in an article, however, makes it too tedious for me. I do not see the problem with allowing users that are logged in to edit even if they are using a privacy service. If you want to ban them, why not just ban their account instead of their IP? Thanks in advance

Decline reason:

Neither 212.117.165.197 nor Sbstn has ever been blocked on the English Wikipedia. Sbstn clearly is not blocked, as that account edited four minutes after this unblock request was made. I can only suspect that you're using some privacy framework like Tor, which we block by policy, or some other network routing framework, in which case you'd need to place the unblock request using the appropriate IP. But as 212.117.165.197 and Sbstn aren't blocked, we can't unblock that which we didn't block Finlay McWalter • Talk 17:23, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.