User talk:Sblecher
Welcome
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. To find out how to make useful contributions, take a look at the welcome page. To stay in Wikipedia, an article has to be about something notable, that is, of general interest. Click on Notability for an explanation of what that means, and on Notability (organizations and companies) for more detail. Also, it must give independently verifiable sources. Articles that don't meet these requirements are likely to be deleted. Follow the links below to learn more:
- To find out more about creating articles, read the Introduction and the Guide to creating your first article.
- You should not write articles about yourself, your band, or your best friend - that's a conflict of interest.
- Wikipedia is not an advertising service or business directory. Before writing about your own business, read Business' FAQ.
- For experiments, please use the sandbox.
JohnCD (talk) 19:16, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Red oak software, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Red oak software and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. gnfnrf (talk) 19:18, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
August 2008
[edit]
The recent edit you made to Red oak software constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Ndenison talk 19:25, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
Please ignore the message immediately above - what you did looked like the sort of vandalism we all too often get, and another user treated it like that; but I take it that you meant to withdraw your entry, realising that it was inappropriate. The page has been set back to what it was before your entry; if you want it deleted you can replace it with {{db-author}} (two curly brackets each side) which means "author requests deletion"; or you can just leave it, and it will get deleted soon anyway. I feel I should apologise to you for the fact that Wikipedia is good at encouraging everyone to contribute, but less good at explaining that it has standards for what is acceptable. There is plenty of guidance - so much that it becomes confusing. The Five Pillars and Your First Article are good starting points. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 19:55, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Red Oak Software, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of Red Oak Software and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. S.D.Jameson 21:49, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi Jameson, Red Oak is listed along with other commercial solutions on this page... http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Enterprise_application_integration#Commercial_solutions
Many of those commercial solutions have profiles on wikipedia. I tried to follow their format and had intended to add historical information about the company in a separate section of the page. Is this not allowed? Why do others with similar pages exist? Yesterday I had cut-n-paste from their "about us page" on their website. It was my first post so I didn't realize that wouldn't be good. That article was marked for deletion because of how it was written. I tried to follow the rules and re-write as explained. Please help. Not sure what I'm doing wrong. Sblecher (talk) 22:01, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- Here's some links you should read: WP:NOTE, WP:RS, and WP:V. Another good one is WP:FIRST. I would not mind at all being a sounding board for you. It's not clear that Red Oak is notable, but we can see what we can do. S.D.Jameson 22:12, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
Your question as to Red Oak Software
[edit]I saw that you posed a question on the talk page of the deleted article. I'm sorry that this has probably been a frustrating experience for you. Please understand that because Wikipedia is open for anyone to edit, we get lots of content added to promote companies or products. As such, these types of articles usually attract a fair bit of scrutiny to make sure that the company meets our inclusion standards. The guideline on business is here. The basic idea is that a company is usually notable enough if it has received coverage or analysis in reliable third party sources - news media, business magazines, business websites etc. If you can include something about that kind of coverage in the article, then it should be safe.
Feel free to ask if you have any more questions.--Kubigula (talk) 22:08, 7 August 2008 (UTC)