User talk:Sayazakardalamdubursaya

Welcome to Wikipedia

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because its username is a blatant violation of our username policy – it is obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. TN X Man 18:39, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sayazakardalamdubursaya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Much preferring to be left in peace than to be commended and banned in the same breath. I've made diligent effort to notate sourcing for anything I've supplied. Bring any exception to that to my notice.Sayazakardalamdubursaya (talk) 04:57, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your user name is unacceptable. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 05:41, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

For reviewing administrators: this is the reason the username is banned. Kindly revoke talk page access. — Yk Yk Yk talk ~ contrib 05:07, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have been personally monitoring this accounts contributions, namely his work at Australia–New Zealand relations, I will say I was quite satisfied and impressed at first, and even awarded this new user a barnstar, something I dont just do lightly, but I have since revoked, very disgusting username now that I know what it means, and I have found some not so good faith edits here and here. I am not an administrator, but I would suggest a 2-4 week or longer block on Flatulotech, provided that as well does not mean anything profane, and I say indef on this one, for sockpuppetry, username abuse and unconstructive edits. But I will say I have seen him work whole-heartedly and constructively taking time and pride on to Au-nz relations page, I think after a long time to think about it, perhaps he could come back and contribute positively again, If he reverts to old bad behavior rangeblock all indefinately, but I feel this user deserves one more chance. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 05:59, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sayazakardalamdubursaya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Requesting change of username to 'Dirilampirandisertakan' to quickly resolve this.Sayazakardalamdubursaya (talk) 09:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

A checkuser has verified that you are a sockpuppet of indefinitely blocked user Flatulotech (talk · contribs). Favonian (talk) 12:34, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What does that translate as? Nick-D (talk) 10:02, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is the English language wikipedia & that qualifies the question as impertinent, along with other trivia like the meaning of your name. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sayazakardalamdubursaya (talk • contribs) 10:49, 3 February 2012

I'm not sure what you're getting at here. Given that your current user name is unacceptable, it's reasonable to ask what this new one translates as. Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Given that your first chosen name is wholly unacceptable, a view which you seem to have trouble accepting, I would personally recommend declining unblock until you furnish the correct translation of the new name you are requesting.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:08, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Google translate from Indonesian says "self-attachment is included". The first one indeed translates as something blatantly sexual. Orderinchaos 13:25, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, I have spoken by 'phone to a person who speaks fluent Indonesian and he could not translate this. It would appear not to be Indonesian, but could be Malay. Let us wait for a response from the editor in question. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:30, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't matter if he changes his username. This account is a sockpuppet and has been blocked indefinitely. If the person wishes to continue editing, he should do so under his original (master) account, which has also been blocked for WP:BLP violations. — Yk Yk Yk talk ~ contrib 16:38, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]