User talk:Savolmi

Savolmi, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Savolmi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Invesdor for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Invesdor is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Invesdor until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I am One of Many (talk) 06:58, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Invesdor text.png

Thanks for uploading File:Invesdor text.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

WP:GNG contains the main guidelines for establishing notability and WP:COMPANY discusses how the guidelines are interpreted for companies. Note that providing sources that demonstrate notability is not the same as providing sources for verifiability. Depth of coverage is very important for notability: for example, if a newspaper article mentions that John Smith is CEO of ABCorp, that's enough for verifiability but, if that's all the article says about ABCorp, it doesn't demonstrate that the company is notable. So, what we're looking for is articles that contain a fairly in-depth discussion of Invesdor. That doesn't mean the whole article has to be about the company but at least a couple of paragraphs is normally needed. Also, it helps a lot if the coverage is in a non-specialist source. For example, general-circulation newspapers usually give more evidence of notability than business publications. I've put your talk page on my watchlist so I'll see if you reply here. Dricherby (talk) 17:37, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]