Jump to content

User talk:Saveykum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Prarambha (April 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Sulfurboy (talk) 07:08, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Saveykum! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 07:08, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

[edit]

Information icon Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Draft:Anusha Rai, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Only the creator of a page may request its deletion under the G7 speedy deletion criteria. As you didn't create Draft:Anusha Rai you can't request its deletion for that reason. Callanecc (talkcontribslogs) 08:04, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Saveykum. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Anusha Rai, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Saveykum. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Saveykum|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. - RichT|C|E-Mail 16:26, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]