User talk:Saveliy

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- getcrunk juice ^contribs 14:59, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you.

TheRingess 15:14, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 15:19, Jan. 4, 2006

Second warning

Please stop adding nonsense articles to Wikipedia. This is also considered vandalism. You will be blocked without warning if you continue. 23skidoo 15:32, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the page Gay, this is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:22, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commercial links — or links to your own private websites — to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. See the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. -- pgk^(talk) 19:05, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:502.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:502.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 00:42, 18 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Joke.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Joke.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then it needs to be specified where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, consider reading fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, consider checking that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Image legality questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 11:39, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to World trade center. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Tuspm ^{[Leave A Message]} 17:53, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

deletion from Dow Jones Industrial Average

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Desertsky85451 03:44, 29 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Rawr 18:29, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Tyson Moore 12:45, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked indef

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saveliy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

well hello my real name is saveliy krylov thats why i created an account freesaveliy in 2011, wikipedia discovered that freesaveliy is a sockpuppet of chaosname but the thing is that chaosname isnt my real username the real and original is this user saveliy which is my first and real account created in 2006, so please give me another chance because i have now been honest and revealed all my secrets regarding wikipedia Saveliy (talk) 00:11, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I see no evidence that you honestly have changed; if you want to, see WP:STANDARDOFFER Ironholds (talk) 02:34, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nope, Checkusers have got Freesaveliy dead-to-rights. If you're claiming *you're* Freesaveliy, then by extension you are also claiming you're Chaosname. —Jeremy v^_^v ^{Components:V S M} 00:25, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why would then a 5 year old account that never contributed in 5 years suddenly come to life and claim things ? give the right to edit chaosname talkpage for chaosname and i will prove that chaosname is meSaveliy (talk) 00:30, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI thread for whatever admin reviews this unblock request. --B (talk) 01:29, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

someone claimed on ANI thread that ive been doing all theese things for 5 years that obviously not true ,yes i have been doing the wrong stuff the past few months but from january 2006 to january 2011 i almoust done nothing at all you can check that such activity doesent existSaveliy (talk) 01:36, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

i seriosly do not understand what is taking place here, can i be unblocked or not ?

I would highly recommend that this be rejected. I don't care if he's been vandalizing and mass socking for five months or five years, he's been nothing but trouble. Second chances are for people that have taken a good deal of time away from Wikipedia entirely, and come back with credible promises not to cause trouble again. You've been causing trouble within the last 12 hours, so you can beg and beg and beg and no one will trust any promises you make now. Sven Manguard Wha? 02:30, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]