User talk:SaveOurHistory

Welcome!

Hello, SaveOurHistory, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Civil War Trust. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Longhair\^talk 21:08, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits to Civil War Trust and elsewhere

Hello, SaveOurHistory. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. Editing for the purpose of advertising or promotion is not permitted. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. -- FeRD_NYC (talk) 02:59, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Princeton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Revolutionary War (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, SaveOurHistory. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing

Hi! I read your disclosure here, for which thank you! You've made a large number of edits to American Battlefield Trust, which as an editor with a paid interest you should not have done – please see WP:COI and WP:PAID for guidance. In a nutshell, paid editors are strongly discouraged from direct editing of any affected article, but may instead propose improvements using {{request edit}} on the relevant talk-page. I haven't reviewed your edits in detail, and for all I know they may be fine, but in any case you should have followed the recommended procedure. Would you kindly make a point of doing so in future? Thank you, Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:51, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for failing to respond to your note earlier. I did not notice the alert. Nearly all of my dozens of edits have involved replacing a source link that is no longer functional (the page no longer exists) and replacing it with a valid source link. Dozens of edits have also involved updating the name of the organization, which has changed from the Civil War Trust to the American Battlefield Trust. And many edits have also been to update the number of acres preserved by the Trust on a particular battlefield. The Trust is constantly making new purchases -- about two dozen or more a year -- and the information on those various Wikipedia pages needs to be updated from time to time to be accurate. That is what I have been doing. All of my work has been to keep more than 100 Wikipedia pages accurate and up to date. Given the dozens and dozens of small changes that needed to be made, I figured it best to make them rather than unnecessarily tie up you folks with what amounts to routine maintenance. I have perhaps 40 or 50 more pages for which a source for one reference not needs to be updated as well as the name of the organization. How do you suggest I go about trying to do this? Again, my only aim, and that of the Trust, is to make Wikipedia more accurate and to replace a non-functional link on a source note with one that works. SaveOurHistory (talk) 15:29, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Graham87 04:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have shown absolutely no indication of responding to the important message above by @Justlettersandnumbers:. Your username is also highly opinionated; most usernames of established Wikipedia users don't contain imperatives. Graham87 04:15, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for failing to respond to the note from Justlettersandnumber and to yours. I did not notice the alerts. I would be happy to switch to a user name that is not considered to be opinionated. As to the work I've done, nearly all of my dozens of edits have involved replacing a source link that is no longer functional (the page no longer exists) and replacing it with a valid source link. Dozens of edits have also involved updating the name of the organization, which has changed from the Civil War Trust to the American Battlefield Trust. And many edits have also been to update the number of acres preserved by the Trust on a particular battlefield. The Trust is constantly making new purchases -- about two dozen or more a year -- and the information on those various Wikipedia pages needs to be updated from time to time to be accurate. All of my work has been to keep more than 100 Wikipedia pages accurate and up to date. Given the small changes that needed to be made on dozens and dozens of pages, I figured it best to make them rather than unnecessarily tie up you folks with what amounts to routine maintenance. I have perhaps 40 or 50 more pages for which a source for one reference not needs to be updated as well as the name of the organization. How do you suggest I go about trying to do this? My only aim, and that of the Trust, is to make Wikipedia more accurate and to replace non-functional links on source notes with ones that work. Again, my apologies for not responding to these messages earlier. SaveOurHistory (talk) 15:28, 22 June 2023 (UTC) SaveOurHistory (talk) 15:38, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]