User talk:SavageCabbages

Welcome!

Hello, SavageCabbages, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Gubbi Gubbi people does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! clpo13_(talk) 17:07, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2021

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Gubbi Gubbi people. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. clpo13_(talk) 23:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 23:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:02, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:SavageCabbages reported by User:Laterthanyouthink (Result: ). Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:01, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SavageCabbages. You've been warned for edit warring per the complaint at the noticeboard. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 19:59, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello EdJohnston, I can't seem to gather enough evidence to support the facts. The gubbi gubbi has been thrown out of court for being fiction and the original name was, and has always been Kabi Kabi. I have the journals of the Explorers john and James Green, who were the first white men to travel with the aborigines in the early 1800s. They both describe the Kabi Kabi and their multiple clans of the noosa and Gympie area. These do gooders think they can just revert my edits when gubbi gubbi is being dropped as people are learning that its made up by Eve fesl. Thanks SavageCabbages (talk) 20:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]