User talk:Saurabhkr wiki

Hello! Saurabhkr wiki, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. An awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Rosiestep (talk) 07:12, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. . -- Irn (talk) 02:59, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

yummy Simmi123 (talk) 14:03, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sanaya Irani

May I ask why you reverted Sanaya's page after I referenced the article? Was there something that I did wrong?? - My version: Previous version - 21:36, 9 June 2012 Coolcool2012 (talk) 16:39, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Saurabhkr wiki, I also have concerns with your edits to the Sanaya Irani article, some of which make no sense whatsover. For example, why would you remove sources and add "citation needed" templates? And why would you tag something as "citation needed" in the infobox (namely her religion) when it is clearly sourced inline with the corresponding content in the article? Perhaps it would be helpful if you would discuss your desired changes and get consensus prior to editing the article further per the bold, revert, discuss cycle. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 14:54, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in you being blocked from editing. It appears you have been warned a few times before. To reiterate, if you have any problems with the current version, please discuss your concerns on the talk page. - Coolcool₂₀₁₂ (talk to me) 14:46, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Important note - Saurabhkr wiki, you are still making the same inexplicable edits I outlined in my previous message to you (in the section above). This is becoming disruptive and needs to sop. I once again direct you to the article's talk page to discuss your concerns and potential edits to Sanaya Irani. If you continue to restore the same version without discussing it on the talk page, or addressing the concerns raised by multiple editors here, you may be blocked from editing. --Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 15:55, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

yummy only for you