User talk:Saundra4you

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. FiredanceThroughTheNight (talk) 16:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

March 2016

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Diamond and Silk, you may be blocked from editing. You may well disadgree with the content of an article: in that case it is suggested you read the policy on discussion, and raise your thoughts on the article's Talk Page. Unfortunately repeatedly reverting and blanking can lead to sanction. Thanks! _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Saundra4you reported by User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (Result: ). Thank you. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 16:37, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User: Fortuna Imparatrix Mundi should not be allowed to remove and replace information that I or someone else write on this page. This is vandalism to the Wikipedia brand and page. Sign Saundra

You should probably post your comments on the page linked to above, that way more editors will see them. Cheers, _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 17:22, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Diamond and Silk

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Saundra4you reported by User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (Result: Blocked). If you have strong partisan feelings in favor of the subject of an article, you probably shouldn't be changing their article yourself. You could make comments on the article talk page instead. If this behavior continues you may be completely blocked from Wikipedia. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 17:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

About wikipedia

Hi, Saundra4you. I note your comments:

should not be allowed to remove and replace information that I or someone else write on this page. This is vandalism to the Wikipedia brand and page.

and

is removing my content and replacing it with his or hers. Don't remove my content and replace with a derogatory message. This is not fair to the users of Wikipedia.

You need to understand that wikipedia is not a promotional site for you. You need to understand that what is and is not acceptable on a wikipedia page is dictated by wikipedia policy, and not by your whims. Information which should not be on the page, whether or not you added it, will be removed. I note, too, your edit summary comment:

HATEFUL AND RACIST PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO SABOTAGE THE IMAGE OF THIS PAGE

I don't think that is true. I think a growing number of users are unhappy that you misunderstand the purpose and policies of wikipedia, and are removing information in accordance with the normal rules of this place. Neither do I think it is at all useful to use phrases like "HATEFUL AND RACIST" merely because you are not getting your own way. That's the behaviour of a child - a tantrum. You're an adult. Behave accordingly, and show some respect for other editors on wikipedia. thanks --Tagishsimon (talk) 03:35, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TAGISHSIMON, dont be offended by the truth. You need to understand that there are HATEFUL AND RACIST trolls crawling the internet looking for ways to viciously attack someones character because they don't agree with their opinion. I understand how the truth hurts and if you are one of the trolls that I've described,then I suggest that you lick your wounds and move on.

Have a great one.

Conflict of interest

Do you have an association with Diamond and Silk? Snooganssnoogans (talk) 17:55, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring on Diamond and Silk

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.. Snooganssnoogans (talk) 17:56, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ——SerialNumber54129 18:47, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

November 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 18:56, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]