User talk:SassyDetective1999

November 2024

Hello, I'm Cowboygilbert. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Sarah Yorke Jackson, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 18:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Sarah Yorke Jackson, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Multiple of the sources in the article all say July 1805, please provide a source for this change. Cowboygilbert - (talk) ♥ 19:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi SassyDetective1999! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of an article several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:21, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 00:39, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy, as you did with this edit to Sarah Yorke Jackson. SmittenGalaxy | talk! 00:45, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:39, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, probably hoaxes.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:25, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]