User talk:Sascha30

Welcome!

Hello, Sascha30, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! JohnCD (talk) 11:06, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

International recognition of South Sudan

Welcome, again. I do not think www.thestudentroom.co.uk is a sufficiently reliable source for additions to this page, because it seems anyone who signs on can post there. See WP:Verifiability and WP:Reliable sources. Also, your edits broke the layout of the table. If you make an edit and, when you press "Show preview", the result doesn't look right, don't go ahead and click "Save page". If it is a table (which can be quite complicated to get right), you can always suggest on the article talk page the changes you think should be made, and a more experienced user can make them. Discussion on the talk page is also the next step to take if your edits are reverted - don't just repeat them. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 11:08, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sascha30 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page.

I think you're making some positive contributions to the encyclopedia. But pretending to be "Brian from the USA", "Alex from the USA" and "Bryan from the UK" to support your position isn't allowed. Please see WP:SOCK for an explanation. If you have any questions about this you can leave me a message on my talk page. TDL (talk) 08:29, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't!

Sascha, i) logon when you edit, and ii), keep to the point (See: WP:NPA). What you did here under ip 79.233.36.214 is completely unacceptable. L.tak (talk) 20:47, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Bazonka (talk) 11:30, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to International recognition of Kosovo, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: International recognition of Kosovo was changed by Sascha30 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.907744 on 2011-12-26T18:58:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from International recognition of Kosovo. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lucasoutloud (talk) 18:58, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at International recognition of Kosovo with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 19:00, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at International recognition of Kosovo, you may be blocked from editing. Lucasoutloud (talk) 19:00, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Bazonka (talk) 21:29, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. EyeSerene^talk 17:52, 8 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sascha30 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was unfairly blocked by a groupf of provocateurs— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sascha30 (talk • contribs)

Decline reason:

If there is a provocator that got you blocked, that provocator is yourself. Max Semenik (talk) 19:26, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.