User talk:Sarmiento 007

Welcome!

Hello, Sarmiento 007, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Malaimagen, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Animalparty! (talk) 23:05, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Malaimagen

The article Malaimagen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --Animalparty! (talk) 23:05, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at The Fool on the Hill, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 01:27, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at The Fool on the Hill. Sundayclose (talk) 01:58, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Malaimagen. - FlightTime (open channel) 15:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Harassment

When you have been warned to stay off another editor's Talk page, that means you stay off that editor's Talk page, not immediately post another message there. General Ization ^Talk 03:44, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Reborn. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Let It Be— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:33, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edward Low

I reverted your edit to Edward Low because it was not an improvement to the article. Fish+Karate 10:29, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. The multiple problems with your edit are:

It is not referenced.
Even if it was, there are no reliable sources for Low being the inspiration for the Trafalgar Law character.
Even if there were, it's of tremendously little relevance to the Edward Low article. It should be mentioned at List_of_One_Piece_characters#Trafalgar_Law.
The addition is not written in legible English ("the pirate Trafalgar Law is based in this pirate"; "Low enjoyed to torturate other pirates"; "he can split the enemies with his devil's fruit hability") and is nonsense to the point I have to warn you not to add it again or I'll report you for vandalism.

Thanks, Fish+Karate 09:08, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Blogs are not reliable references. And it's still not written in understandable English, I'm sorry but you are adding nonsense to the article. Please stop now. Fish+Karate 09:24, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Savoy Truffle. Sundayclose (talk) 01:12, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Jorge López (actor), have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. BradfordTalk 22:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Certificate of birthdate.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Certificate of birthdate.pdf. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:46, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tones and I

Hello, I've reverted your recent edit at this article, believing it to be original research. If you wish to discuss this issue, please see the article's talk page.–shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:14, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tones and I, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. You returned material believed to be original research without reaching a consensus.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Tones and I shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Once again, I ask you to discuss this issue on the article's talk page rather continue this edit war.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:32, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The appropriate place to discuss these issues is the article's talkpage. Please do not revert the article without discussing the issues and attempting to reach a consensus.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 00:56, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed your recent content, which was supported by two unreliable sources per Wikipedia:User-generated sources. Again the place to discuss these issues is the article's talkpage.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 05:35, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 20:33, 23 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

why did you do this? Sarmiento 007 (talk) 23:54, 24 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have repeatedly ignored my requests to discuss your issues at the article's talkpage. I have given more details of my objections, here.–shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 12:30, 25 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Tones and I

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the noticeboard. Regardless of the public's need to know, or whether the subject cares about this information being released, you *must* have a source that Wikipedia considers reliable before adding a birthdate to the article. If you are not familiar with the WP:RS rules ask any experienced person. EdJohnston (talk) 16:58, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why am i blocked? I edited a page and put its respective sources Sarmiento 007 (talk) 01:20, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sarmiento 007 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't know why I am blocked because i edited a page and i put the needed sources Sarmiento 007 (talk) 01:23, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

As noted at the edit warring noticeboard, the source you used is not considered appropriate for Wikipedia. Furthermore, even if it were, you cannot edit war to keep it there just because you think it it is correct, as everyone in an edit war thinks that they are correct. Aside from learning more about what reliable sources are, you need tell us the proper ways to resolve an editing dispute for the block to be lifted early. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 07:45, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I've removed the duplicate request. You only need to place it in the larger edit window and not the smaller section header/edit summary window. If you click "edit" instead of "new section", you can avoid creating unnecessary section headers. 331dot (talk) 07:43, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Tkbrett (✉) 20:00, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i changed it because Ringo does not sing in the Reprise... what's your problem? Sarmiento 007 (talk) 20:02, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]