User talk:Sara-rockworth

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Sara-rockworth}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

You have received these suggestions because we are currently running a study to see if SuggestBot is helpful for newly registered Wikipedia editors. Normally SuggestBot only makes suggestions for users who ask for them explicitly on the SuggestBot request page. We will not post suggestions on your talk page again unless you ask for them. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find a complete consent form with contact information on the SuggestBot Study page.

Stubs: Consumer education; Paul S. Bagus; Consumer Action Legal Centre; Business-to-consumer; Polybutylene; Consumer science; Empolis; Consumers Digest; Inclusive business; Social news; Consumability; Data conferencing; Consumer-to-business; Identi.ca; Joseph DeSimone (inventor); Faraday constant; AtGoogleTalks; Digital convergence; Yahoo! Meme

Cleanup: Union Square Ventures; Webring; Social Intelligence Architect
Merge: Tag (metadata); Computer-mediated communication; Public relations
Add Sources: Business-to-business; Food porn; Bangalore
Wikify: Ishayas' Ascension; Consumer Data Industry Association; Consumers' Institute of New Zealand
Expand: Here Comes Everybody; Soft chemistry; Social blogging

SuggestBot picks the articles you might be interested in based on the articles you've edited and using a number of different techniques: following links from them to other articles, matching articles based on their content, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedia users. It tries to recommend only articles that others have marked as needing work, such as stub articles that need to be made longer, clean-up articles that need writing help, and so on. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you choose to participate we encourage you to leave feedback on these suggestions, which you can most easily do here by editing your user talk page. We'll stop by later to read them.

Regards, Nettrom (talk), project researcher and SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:32, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent messages at User talk:JamesBWatson#Assistance PLEASE!

First of all "You're not near as awful as I thought". No, I'm not, really. Honest. It is very easy for a new editor to get the impression that others are attacking when in fact they are really just trying to explain Wikipedia's methods. When I first started editing there was one editor who I was convinced was reverting my edits for quite unacceptable reasons to do with a conflict of interest. I now realise that in fact that editor was acting completely impartially, and doing much the same as I would now do in the same situation, now that I know more about how the system operates, but at the time I found it frustrating. I can well believe that you have found even greater frustration, as you had put in the work of writing a reasonably sizeable article, whereas I started by just making minor edits to existing articles, so I had less work to lose. I think that doing little edits at first is probably the best way to learn how Wikipedia works, holding back from writing whole new articles until you are more experienced, but understandably many people come here and write whole articles which are either deleted or savagely edited. This often causes frustration and anger, and many such editors unfortunately then get put off Wikipedia for ever. I am glad that you evidently have whatever it takes to come through a bad early experience and still carry on. Your willingness to turn to editors you have had disagreements with and ask for help is rare for a new user, and it is, I am convinced, one of the most useful personality traits for someone who is going to get significantly involved in Wikipedia, as one is likely to come across conflicts from time to time.

Your barnstar attempt failed, but I was touched by the thought: thank you. For future reference what you needed to do was copy and past {{subst:The Special Barnstar|Your message here ~~~~}} into the talk page. The "subst" is an instruction to the Wikimedia software to substitute the correct text for the barnstar in place of what you have typed. It looks as though you tried copying and pasting a ready-made barnstar from someone else's page, and this led to two problems. Firstly, you included someone else's signature, which presumably you didn't mean to. Secondly, you missed out the code which tells the software when it has reached the end of the barnstar, so it treated everything further down the page as part of the barnstar. Using "subst" to get the job done automatically is much better. You will find a full list of barnstars at Wikipedia:Barnstars if you ever want another one. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:04, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstars

You did it! See, not so difficult, once you know how. (Oh yes, and thanks, too.) JamesBWatson (talk) 19:02, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, after writing the above I saw the continuing problems you had before finally getting it right. Perhaps I should explain (in case you haven't worked it out for yourself, which by now perhaps you have). I placed<nowiki> in the text I wrote when editing to make the software display for you the actual text you needed to copy and paste. If I had left out the <nowiki> then it would have actually translated the text into a barnstar instead, which was not the idea. This means that you had to copy the test as you saw it when reading this page, not the text you saw when editing this page. Does that make sense to you? If not sorry for not expressing it clearly. (In addition, you missed out the </nowiki> at the end which is what tells the software to go back to translating what it reads. Then you tried to put it in, but missed out the "/".) Finally you got it right. Confusing? Yes. I found editing Wikipedia hopelessly confusing when I started. So how long does it take before you know it all and never have any problems? I don't know, because I'm not there yet. It does get better, though. Now I occasionally have problems, instead of frequently. Do feel welcome to ask me if you need help with editing, if you like, but be prepared for the possibility that my answer could be "I don't know". Somewhere there's a help page on all this. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:18, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

thanks

Thanks:

http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User_talk:Okip#Comment.2FFeedback

that was nice. I edit wikia now (35,000+ edits), key word is "edit" instead of endlessly bickering with bullies here.

you seem new. I hope they don't eat you alive. Okip 22:11, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]