User talk:Santo Neuenwelt

Welcome

Hello, Santo Neuenwelt, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! FloNight ^talk 21:12, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hans Sitt

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributions to the Hans Sitt article, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing! Kusma (討論) 00:54, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you wrote the material yourself, then there are several ways that you can make sure it does not get deleted here. For example, you could put a notice on your other web site that says that you release the material under the GFDL, so it can be used here without infringing on anybody's copyright. Or you can use an email address associated with the website to file a confirmation of your release of the material under the GFDL with our permissions department at "permissions at wikimedia dot org". You can look at Wikipedia:Confirmation of permission for some more instructions. You should in any case put a notice about the source and that you have permission to use the material into either a "Source" section of the articles or on their talk pages. I am sorry if this is a bit complicated and you have a hard time getting started here, and I hope this doesn't make you feel unwelcome. If you follow the instructions, it should be possible to work this out. If you have further questions, don't hesitate to ask. Kusma (討論) 14:07, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have now announced the article at Portal:Germany/New article announcements#New stubs. Happy editing and sorry you had all this trouble with the copyright section, Kusma (討論) 19:25, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issues

Yes, welcome to Wikipedia. I strongly suggest you read up on our Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, specifically concerning copying copyrighted text. I had to delete a number of the articles you created because they were copied verbatim from other sources. While this doesn't mean these articles shouldn't be here (in fact, they should) we can't accept copied text. Best, --Alabamaboy 01:05, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining the issue. If you own the copyright to the text you inserted, you can license the copyrighted text under the GNU Free Documentation License (see the link for info) and then post it on Wikipedia. Unless this is done the text is still considered copyrighted under our Wikipedia:Copyrights policy and we can't accept it. If you agree to do this, then go to Wikipedia:Successful requests for permission and place a statement that your organization agrees to the GNU license. Understand, though, that this means you are essentially giving up your copyright for the copy you have on your website. Here's the short blurb:

Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no Invariant Sections, with no Front-Cover Texts, and with no Back-Cover Texts.

A copy of the license is included in the section entitled "GNU Free Documentation License".

Hope this helps. Best, --Alabamaboy 13:57, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for using the GFDL license and sending in the e-mail. Once the permission has had a few days to work its way into the system I will restore the articles I deleted. Best, --Alabamaboy 05:37, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the articles and left a notice on their talk pages to this effect:

User:Santo Neuenwelt obtained permission to use this text under the GNU Free Documentation License and provided this documentation to Wikipedia. See note at User_talk:Alabamaboy#Have_Taken_Your_Advice for more information

Thank you for doing the GFDL license. Best, --Alabamaboy 18:50, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I only undeleted the articles that I deleted. If you want to revert the missing info in those other articles you'll have to do it. Best, --Alabamaboy 19:38, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Linkspam

I also noticed that you inserted a lot of linkspam into different classical music articles (mainly to http://editionsilvertrust.com). Please refrain from doing this as it is against Wikipedia policies.--Alabamaboy 01:15, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your explanation for the links sounds reasonable. Since this is a not-for-profit affair and the info is not available elsewhere, go ahead and insert the links. If anyone raises any issue with them again drop me a line and I'll defend you. Best, --Alabamaboy 13:59, 29 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I, too, have noticed the apparent linkspam; You'll need to give some explanation: is the company, as implied, a charity? Can you give an example of info that is "not available elsewhere"? More importantly, why would this "Edition Silvertrust" be considered a *reliable* and neutral source of such info? Also, please disclose any relation you have to Edition Silvertrust; your additions may be a conflict of interest. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 07:00, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Articles question

I only undeleted the articles that I deleted. If you want to restore the missing info in those other articles you'll have to do that (and it's easy to do--simply go to the history page of that article, click on the link to the version you want, click edit when that version comes up and simply save it as the new version). If I failed to undeleted one of the article, do let me know. Best, --Alabamaboy 20:48, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Decent stuff - I've added an image for you. Always find an image if you can. Good luck editing Ernst Stavro Blofeld 21:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC) See also how to categorize this is very! importanrt see Zygmunt now. Ernst Stavro Blofeld 21:03, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Schubert & Svendsen opp. 1

Schubert's opus 1 is the very very famous Erlkönig song. You can check it even here: Schubert_compositions_D_number_1-504, under the D number 328 or here: Der_Erlkönig#The_Franz_Schubert_composition. So now, You can revert Your own edit ;)) Szpawq 22:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ambroise Thomas and GFDL material from Edition Silvertrust website

On 6 April 2006 you added some material to Ambroise Thomas, including the note:

Some of the material in the above article appears on the website of Edition Silvertrust but permission to copy, distribute and alter has been given to Wikipedia under the terms of the GNU License in accordance with the GDFL.

That just caught my attention because of the misspelling (GDFL vs. GFDL) but I was curious about the note itself. I can't find any reference to licensing terms either at http://www.editionsilvertrust.com/thomas-string-quartet-1.htm or by searching http://www.editionsilvertrust for "gnu", "license", "gfdl", or "gdfl". Was the permission given in private correspondence, and if so, what procedure does Wikipedia use to keep track of it? -- ToE^T 02:54, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Karel Navrátil

Please look at the page for Karel Navrátil. I have edited this according to your comments. Do you see any other issues? Please feel free to expand the article. Pkeets (talk) 23:51, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]