User talk:Santixd12

September 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Linsey Godfrey has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Linsey Godfrey was changed by Santixd12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86535 on 2020-09-02T19:45:25+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:45, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent additions has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:14, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Santixd12, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Santixd12! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like John from Idegon (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

March 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Academy Award for Best Picture, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. (CC) Tbhotch^™ 16:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

Please stop adding copyrighted images to Wikipedia (both on commons, and then adding them here). Please read Wikipedia:Uploading images; none of these images you have uploaded are your "own work", they are the work of someone else. Endwise (talk) 12:37, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello, I'm Qzd. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Barry Keoghan, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Qzd (talk) 18:40, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. NGS ^{Shakin' All Over} 19:44, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oran Zegman moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Oran Zegman, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PRAXIDICAE🌈 17:05, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Oran Zegman (July 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Well done on creating the draft, and it may potentially meet the relevant requirements (including WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:FILMMAKER) but presently does not. Wikipedia's basic requirement for entry is that the subject is notable . Essentially subjects are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. To properly create such a draft page, please see referencing for beginners. Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements then resubmit the page and ping me and I would be happy to reassess.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Oran Zegman and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Oran Zegman, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 23:43, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Smells Like Me (Charlie Puth song) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Smells Like Me (Charlie Puth song), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bruxton (talk) 18:19, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Oran Zegman

Hello, Santixd12. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Oran Zegman, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Oran Zegman

Hello, Santixd12. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Oran Zegman".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:44, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Smells Like Me (Charlie Puth song)

Hello, Santixd12. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Smells Like Me (Charlie Puth song), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Smells Like Me (Charlie Puth song)

Hello, Santixd12. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Smells Like Me".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:29, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Liam Payne

Do not add photos that are unsubstantiated for sources! Another editor has remover the photo.

kindest regards

Sophies mommy1988 (talk) 22:26, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's also no evidence it is your own work, it appears to be potentially a copyright violation as it has been published on social media and in some Argentinian media sources. AusLondonder (talk) 22:28, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry for the misunderstanding. The photos are real, but I'm pretty sure they are not a copyright violation. Also, well-know news shows and web sites are saying they are true here in Argentina.

Hope we can get an agreement! Santixd12 (talk) 22:33, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unless photos are released officially you cannot add them. What you did is considered vandalism. Any further cases and you could be banned from Wikipedia. Sophies mommy1988 (talk) 22:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file has now been removed from the commons - [1] SimplyLouis27 (talk) 22:39, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I did not know about that, I'm very sorry. If i upload the photos as copyright and I put sources in it, is it correct or not? Santixd12 (talk) 22:42, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please read Wikipedia:Uploading images, this will help you SimplyLouis27 (talk) 22:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Santixd12 (talk) 22:52, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

liampayneroom.jpg is ok? Santixd12 (talk) 22:56, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is not a source. That is a file name. A source would be a link to a verified news source. Sophies mommy1988 (talk) 20:30, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry... the photo, that file name... I uploaded it in Commons with sources and specifying that is not my work. Is it ok now? Santixd12 (talk) 21:26, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. You are just not getting it. Uploading that photo is considered vandalism. I would suggest you learn a LOT more about editing, how to cite sources and when it’s appropriate to upload photos of that nature….which in fact is never. You seem obsessed with trying to get this photo uploaded. At this point, I would just drop the subject. Sophies mommy1988 (talk) 23:53, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok sorry, didn't want you to get angry or whatever... just trying to learn here, and I thought at the beginning that the photo was useful, I guess it's not. Santixd12 (talk) 00:50, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Liam Payne; it is considered vandalism. Please see the image use policy for appropriate use of images in Wikipedia. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Image you added has inaccurate description from the uploader - is this actually their own work? SimplyLouis27 (talk) 22:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're effectively admitting here it is not your own work, and is therefore a copyright violation. AusLondonder (talk) 22:33, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File has now been removed from commons - [2] SimplyLouis27 (talk) 22:38, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you check the thread above, it seems ‘our friend’ has either uploaded it again or is hell bent on doing it. I don’t know how to check Commons so perhaps you can do that? Thankyou! Sophies mommy1988 (talk) 23:55, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]