User talk:Santiagokdasilva1

Welcome!

Hello, Santiagokdasilva1, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Bility (talk) 16:50, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard - a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:39, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jamie Lee Ruiz

The article Jamie Lee Ruiz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Notability issue

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Divide et Impera (talk) 03:13, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Caregory:Argentine vedettes

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Caregory:Argentine vedettes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Tinton5 (talk) 00:32, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is a vedette, anyway, so I can correctly categorize Category:Argentine vedettes? —C.Fred (talk) 00:49, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Andrea Ghidone

The article Andrea Ghidone has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article. The nominator also raised the following concern:

All biographies of living people created after March 18, 2010, must have references.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. SwisterTwister talk 21:56, 23 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mike Manning (Activist)

The article Mike Manning (Activist) has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:01, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011

Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from an article unless it contains at least one reliable source or was created before 18 March 2010. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider sourcing the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:17, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Manning

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your creation of the Mike Manning (activist) article, as we really appreciate your participation. However, Wikipedia cannot accept unsourced material or original research. This includes material lacking cited sources, or obtained through personal knowledge or unpublished synthesis of previously published material. Wikipedia requires that all material added to articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here.

Such sources should be secondary sources, that is, those that are independent of the subject. Self-published sources, including websites whose content is user-generated, are not permitted as sources, as indicated at WP:SELFPUB and WP:USERG, which are part of the site's Source Reliability policy.

Also, subjects must qualify for their own Wikipedia articles by way of Notability. Generally speaking, appearing as a cast member on a season of a reality television show does not make one notable. (An example of precedent for this is here.) It is for this reason that I placed the AfD tag on the article, which should not be removed unless you disagree with it on the basis of Wikipedia's Notability Guideline. May I ask if you have a valid, policy-based rationale for disagreeing with this, and if so, what it is?

Lastly, a few other things to keep in mind when writing encyclopedia articles:

The name of the TV series Manning was on is The Real World, or if you prefer to reference the particular season, The Real World: DC. It is not simply "DC".
Encyclopedias are to be written in the formal tone, and as such we do not refer to subjects by their given name, but by their surname.
We do not embolden the names of article subjects, except in the opening sentence of the Lead, and we do not italicize their names at all.
Spaces go after commas and the end of sentences.
Proper nouns are capitalized. This includes names of people ("mike"), and locations such as washington's sports bar & grill.
Please do not wikilink terms for which there are no articles, such as "now-passed Anti-Hate Crimes Bill".

If you have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page.

Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 23:14, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not revert my edits to the article unless you have a valid, policy-based rationale for doing so. In general, you should summarize your edits, and any relevant policies you're citing with an edit summary, and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. Wikipedia has guidelines that must be followed by those who wish to edit here. If you need help learning how to edit here, I'd be happy to help you. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 23:23, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Santiagokdasilva1, you need to stop reverting the article. You are violating Wikipedia's policies, and if you continue to ignore them, as well as my messages to you, you run the risk of being blocked from editing. Please do not make this necessary. Please acknowledge my messages to you, and comply with the site's rules. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 23:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is telling you that there is something wrong with your edits because Wikipedia is made up of editors and administrators like me whose job it is to inform new editors like yourself that we have rules that you have to follow if you want to edit here. In that sense, people like me are Wikipedia, just as you are. By saying "you're not Wikipedia", you're implying a disparity that does not exist, since "Wikipedia" isn't some inanimate monolith, it's an aggregate community composed of people like me. Since I pointed out the policies and guidelines that you were violating, and linked you to them so that you could read and learn them, on what basis do you ignore my warnings? Are you saying that you don't have to follow the rules when you visit someone else's property?

You also say that I'm "the only one" who is informing you of this. So what? Are you implying that you get to decide how many editors have to contact you before you decide to acknowledge what they're saying? You don't. Like it or not, you have to follow Wikipedia's guidelines and policies, and if you ignore administrators when they try to point this out to you, you're going to end up losing your editing privileges.

This is your final warning. The next time you violate the site's policies, you will be blocked from editing. Again, do not make that necessary. Nightscream (talk) 23:46, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Again, when you say, "Wikipedia accepts what I'm writing", what exactly do you mean by "Wikipedia"? What does this mean? Has some consensus of editors on this site indicated that your edits are in full compliance with its policies? Has Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales contacted you personally? Wikipedia is not a single person. It's a community of thousands of editors who have written the various policies and guidelines that I have linked you to. If someone points out that you're violating policy, it does not matter if it's just one editor; if what they're saying about the policies in question is accurate, then you should acknowledge what they're saying. How many editors have to communicate with you on a given matter before you feel you are required to listen? Two? Ten? Fifty? If you want to join a website, the obligation is on you to follow its rules. The obligation is not on all the other people who've been there for years to walk on eggshells around you while you decide you can do whatever you like. I see no evidence that any person or entity on this site has conferred any stamp of approval for your edits, one way or another.

What I do see is that in the seven days that you've been editing here, editors have welcomed you here, offered advice, sometimes offered you polite admonishments as you've begun to familiarize yourself with the site (which is perfectly normal for new editors, mind you), and you've chosen to ignore these overtures. One message above, for example, explained to you that you need to sign your talk page messages, yet you left one on my talk page unsigned.

I did not simply "erase" the article. If you looked at my edits, you'll notice that I cleaned up much of your poor punctuation, spelling, formatting, your insistence on referring to Manning with his given name, added fact tags to the article, etc. I also tried asking you about your viewpoint with regard to the site's Notability Policy, and you never responded.

I will summarize to you the issues regarding the article one more time:

In order for a person to be the subject of their own Wikipedia article, they must be notable. Sources are needed to establish notability.
Sources are also needed for the rest of the material in the article in order to satisfy the site's policy on Verifiability. Contrary to your assertion, everything you wrote did not "come with the source", as much of the material in the article was missing any sources.
Sources need to be reliable sources published in credentialed venues, are must be independent of the subject. Self-published and user-generated sources are not permitted, and that includes the subject's official website. If you read my message above, and these linked policies, you'll understand this.

I could've simply turned that article into a redirect that leads back to the Real World: DC article, but I figured I'd give you an opportunity to argue your case for why Manning qualifies as notable. For now, I'll nominate the article for deletion, and if you cannot provide independent reliable sources that establish his notability, that will probably happen a week from now. If you have any other questions, let me know. Nightscream (talk) 00:21, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for deliberately violating numerous Wikipedia policies with your edits to the Mike Manning (actor) article, and ignoring repeated warnings, the most recent edits being these. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

No problem. In the future, if others inform you that your edits do not conform to certain policies, and they try to explain those policies to you, please try to heed them. Again, if you ever have any other questions or need help understanding the site's rules, just let me know. Nightscream (talk) 08:30, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please read the policies that I have previously mentioned to you above. Do not add unsourced material to articles or refer to the subjects of biographical articles by their given name, as you did with these additions you made to the Mike Manning article. Material added to articles must be accompanied by citations of reliable, verifiable sources. Where information on the subject's work and accomplishments is concerned, the sources need to be Secondary Sources.

In addition, the Lead section is to be a summary of the article's most salient points, specifically, the things for which a subject is most notable. Things like personal interests or hobbies, if sourced, should go in the Personal life section. Lastly, please do not use dated wording that does not clearly indicate a specific time or time frame to the reader, such as "Manning just wrapped". As indicated by WP:DATED, specific time references should be used instead. If you have any further questions on these guidelines, let me know. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 20:36, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Try searching for a better source for the material. Sites whose content is user-generated, such as imdb, are not considered reliable, under WP:USERG. Make sure also that you paraphrase material that you find. If you cannot find reliable sources, then you cannot add it to the article.

Just out of curiosity, why did you add those surnames to the articles of Kim and Kendall Kardashian and Beyonce Knowles? Nightscream (talk) 21:22, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please remember to sign your talk page posts. You can do this by typing four tildes (~~~~) at the end of them, which will automatically timestamp them too.

Kim Kardashian's maiden name is Kardashian, not Houghton. Houghton is her mother's maiden name. Similarly, Kendall Jenner's surname is Jenner, the name of her father, as she has never been married. Beyonce Knowles' surname is Knowles. The "some reason" for this is that Houghton and Beyincé have never been their names, and you did not provide any source indicating that they were. Where did you get the idea that their mothers' maiden names were also their daughters'? Where have you ever referred to Kardashian and Jenner referred to as Kendall Houghton or Kim Houghton? Nightscream (talk) 21:52, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Santiago, you seem to be going back to your old habits. In these edits to Mike Manning, you did the following:

You added unsourced information to the article, despite the fact that this was one of the things I mentioned to you that is not permitted on Wikipedia, and despite the fact that you were blocked for this. Sticking a "citation needed" tag on unsourced material does not permit you to add it to an article.
You sourced some material to imdb. Again, as I told you above, back on September 5, sites whose content is user-generated, such as imdb, are not considered reliable, under WP:USERG.
You placed a reference inside a section heading. This is not permitted.
You listed Manning's performance skills. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. It is not a resume.

Please familiarize yourself with the policies and guidelines I have mentioned to you above. If you continue to ignore them, you risk being blocked from editing. Please do not make it necessary to do so again. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 23:38, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Santiago, please do not add unsourced material to articles, as now see that you did back on January 21 with this edit to the Mike Manning article. We've already been over this. If you want to add material to an article, please make sure it is accompanied by a reliable, verifiable source. Nightscream (talk) 15:27, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you modified information on Manning's height, as I apparently missed your addition of this material back on July 9. Please do not add unsourced material to articles. Thank you. Nightscream (talk) 01:17, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for adding unsourced and poorly sourced material to the Mike Manning (actor) article with this edit, the fifth time you have done this since being blocked for the same offense four months ago. The mikecmanning.com webpage you cited as a source does not mention Manning's year of birth or his city of birth, and the content on Blogger is user-generated, making it an unreliable source according to Wikipedia's policies. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nightscream (talk) 02:51, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to the above, here are a few other tips that might improve your editing when your block expires.

When citing a source more than once, pleased use the ref name citation template/tag. It is redundant to write out the full citation more than once, as you did with the mikecmanning.com cite.
The title of the page from mikecmanning.com that you cited is not "Autobiography" but "Biography".
The word "autobiography" is not spelled "autobiogaphy".
The word "production" is not spelled "produccion".
Only the first word and proper nouns are capitalized in headings, as indicated by WP:SECTIONHEAD. Nightscream (talk) 02:51, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Thank you. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:34, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:35, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many of your recent edits have added unsourced content which does not seem to be verifiable. For example, can find no evidence anywhere to support this edit, this one, or this one. Any name given to a person in an article must be a name that the person has actually used, not one which you think they should use for some reason (such as that it was their mother's maiden name), if the person has never in fact been known by that name. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:53, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ECupid

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the article ECupid, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition was deleted under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License." You may also e-mail or mail the Foundation to release the content. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more.

While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 19:41, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rochelle Diamante

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rochelle Diamante requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DGG ( talk ) 06:08, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Jamie Lee Ruiz, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The Mark of the Beast (talk) 20:32, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sol Giulietti

The article Sol Giulietti has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:38, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Adabel Guerrero, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Pitched (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Vedette (showgirl) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vedette (showgirl) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vedette (showgirl) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Sandor Earl, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Morrow (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Benjamin Godfre, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Target (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 20

Hi. When you recently edited Mike Manning (actor), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Producer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Santiagokdasilva1/Guyunusa (Charrúa) has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Guyunusa (Charrúa), this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 21:01, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Guyunusa (Charrúa).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Aaron Booth (talk) 05:28, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. When you recently edited Max Cortés, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caucasion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:33, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Guyunusa (Charrúa).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 08:21, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adabel Guerrero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quotes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:03, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mónica Farro, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Italian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:17, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adabel Guerrero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acrobat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vanessa Curry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:08, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Belén Francese, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hostess (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Valeria Archimó, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Director (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Excitante, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page European (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:35, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vinny Guadagnino, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sicilian people (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Valeria Archimó, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Replacement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Claudia Fernández, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punta de Rieles (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

cats

Hello Santiagokdasilva1,

I noticed you added the category Uruguayan people of Charrúa descent to the articles Miguel Terekhov, Laureano Tacuavé Martínez, and Michella Jougousa Gununusa. When you do that you can remove any categories of which the category Uruguayan people of Charrúa descent is a subcategory, such as the categories Uruguayan people and Uruguayan people of indigenous peoples descent. Let me know if you have any questions. Dkreisst (talk) 03:39, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Uruguayan people of Gothic descent

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Category:Uruguayan people of Gothic descent, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Constantine ✍ 08:54, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Uruguayan people of Celtic descent

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Category:Uruguayan people of Celtic descent, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Constantine ✍ 08:56, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adabel Guerrero, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Acrobat (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Demographics of Uruguay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Asian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Guyunusa (Charrúa) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Guyunusa (Charrúa), a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 22:23, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Guyunusa (Charrúa)

Hello Santiagokdasilva1. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Guyunusa (Charrúa).

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Guyunusa (Charrúa)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hasteur (talk) 12:30, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

I should like to remind you once again that something given as a name for someone in a Wikipedia article must be a name that actually is used for that person. Also, in the English language Wikipedia the name given should normally be the name most usually recognised in English. I am aware that in Spanish it is common practice to include a person's mother's maiden name, but no matter what the ethnic background or nationality of a person, if their name is not actually used in that form then that is not the form of the name that should be used in an article about the person. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:23, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Juju Mario

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Juju Mario requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:43, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Belén Francese for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Belén Francese is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Belén Francese until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tgeairn (talk) 21:18, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:51, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 14:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Uruguayan theatrical dancer-actresses has been nominated for splitting

Category:Uruguayan theatrical dancer-actresses has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:59, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]