User talk:Sankeykool

May 2016

Hello, I'm The Masked Man of Mega Might. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Vittal Mallya seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 14:49, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Arun Jaitley

Please read our policy on original research and synthesis. The source says The Congress issued a statement asking, "Whether Vijay Mallya met and spoke to finance minister, Arun Jaitley before he suddenly left the country on 2 March, 2016? Whether Arun Jaitley informed and gave details of this conversation to Prime Minister Narendra Modi? Will the complete details of this meeting and conversation be shared with Parliament and people of India?’’ It does not translate to "he has been accused of assisting Vijay Mallya in leaving from india by informing him in a meeting just the day before Vijay mallya left about the escalation of investigations against mallya" Anyhow, this material is not apt for the lede part of the article which is supposed to be a summary of the page. Instead of reverting yet again, please discuss this on the article talk page first. The Masked Man of Mega Might (talk) 22:52, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Akash Ambani. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Also, do not remove previous warnings/cautions. Nairspecht Converse 08:11, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Sankeykool reported by User:Nairspecht (Result: ). Thank you. Nairspecht Converse 08:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

June 2016

Hello, I'm Nairspecht. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Mukesh Ambani, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You did not cite any sources and only relied on other pages for your content. It is alright if you add controversial content on bio pages but they ALWAYS have to be supported by sources despite of having separate pages (Niira Radia, et al.) Also, there is no mention of the personality in Krishna Godavari Basin. Also, summarizing the content and writing it in your own opinionated words is not accepted on Wikipedia. See WP:POV Best, Nairspecht Converse 09:43, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to Nairspecht's excellent advice, I would like to add (since perhaps you don't know this) that Wikipedia is not considered a reliable source for Wikipedia articles, and thus, external sources that cite Wikipedia for their information are also not used as sources here. This is particularly important in the case of biographies of living people. More information here.

As for adding speculation and unverified rumour, it is a good rule of thumb that any addition of text including phrases like "it is assumed" or "this raises speculations" is inappropriate. If in any doubt at all, always discuss on the article's talk page first.

Finally, this kind of attack on other editors is unacceptable. Please remember to assume good faith in your interactions with other editors, just like you would expect them to do with you. Comment on edits, not on editors. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 09:52, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, I'm Yintan. I noticed that in this edit to Tourism in India, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Yintan 11:08, 1 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]