Jump to content

User talk:Sanjjanaa archana galrani

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sanjjanaa archana galrani, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Sanjjanaa have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome.  Kleuske (talk) 08:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, Sanjjanaa archana galrani. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Sanjjanaa, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

  • avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
  • propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Jessicapierce (talk) 05:13, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Pablomartinez. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Dandupalya 2— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. PabloMartinez (talk) 20:15, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jessicapierce. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sanjjanaa have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Jessicapierce (talk) 02:29, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove this content[edit]

Hi there, re: this, why did you remove this content? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:01, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there again, you didn't answer why you removed the content linked above. I would appreciate an answer about that, please. Additionally, please stop adding your email address to your edit summaries. That content has to be redacted, because we try to preserve people's privacy. Lastly, you have a clear conflict of interest and you, or people close to you, are strongly discouraged from editing the Sanjjanaa article. People who edit content they are close to have a very difficult time writing objectively about themselves. We need objectivity to maintain a neural point of view. Thank you, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:54, 29 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines, as you did at Sanjjanaa.
  • Wikipedia is not a social media or advertising platform. We present content from a netural point of view, and that sometimes means including criticism alongside praise. Removing criticism just because it doesn't help your career is not actually one of Wikipedia's goals.
  • Please do not add puffery to articles as you did here where for some reason we abandon normal article lead structure to talk about the "glamorous" role you played in Ganda Hendathi, and that you got "a lot of critical appreciation as an actress", but failed to provide any reference that describes this wealth of critical appreciation.
  • Please observe our Manual of Style and basic English rules. In these changes, you failed to capitalise proper nouns like India and your own name... Also, we don't use ampersands (&) in professional prose, barring a few exceptions. Also, if you're going to indicate that you are a yoga activist, you will need to demonstrate (with ample references) that this is chiefly what you are known for. We're not here to list all of your hobbies or interests.
  • Please stop adding phone numbers and email addresses in your edit summaries. Unless suppressed or deleted, (as we've had to do with yours), these edit summaries are visible by anybody in the world, in perpetuity. Think about the potential privacy concerns (like harassment) that could result from doing this.
Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. You are being reminded again that since you have a conflict of interest, you are strongly discouraged from editing Sanjjanaa, and you should probably post your concerns on the article's talk page instead. People have a difficult time writing objectively about themselves or subjects they are closely attached to.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:44, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Sanjjanaa. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. L293D ( • ) 18:52, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines, as you did at Sanjjanaa. In this edit you again pepper the article with content about the "many superstars in big budget films" you have worked with, which is puffery, since a person's worth and notability is not derived from the people they work with. Same with phrasing like "She is now currently working in “Swarnakhadgam” the biggest ever budget television women centric show made by the producers of Baahubali themselves", because this tends to suggest that your worth and notability has something to do with high budgets, and that somehow you should be considered more notable because you're working with the producers of Baahubali, which is not the case. We also don't use exaggerated language like "superhit", because that's not objective phrasing. Again your statement that you received accolades for Dandupalya 2 was unsourced. We're not interested in editors' personal opinions, especially when they have a conflict of interest. Some elements of what you contributed may have been constructive, but because they were laden with grammar errors, they would unfairly require someone else to fix them, and thus, they have been removed. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions, but you are once again strongly discouraged from editing that article about you.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:55, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Sanjjanaa archana galrani, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Sanjjanaa, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms our use and policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Darsana.vinod (talk) 08:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Hello, Sanjjanaa archana galrani, please read WP:COIEDIT WP:DCOI and If you want to contribute connected page Sanjjanaa request in talk page Talk:Sanjjanaa mentioning reliable sources. Take care --Darsana.vinod (talk) 09:03, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2018[edit]

Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for continued disruption, refusal to discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:38, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]