User talk:Sanjayp3

Welcome!

June 2012

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Manit Dani, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 19:24, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Manit Dani, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your account being blocked from editing. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 19:44, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Manit Dani

The article Manit Dani has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

It's not entirely clear what it is he's supposedly notable for, and he doesn't appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 06:31, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Manit Dani for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manit Dani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manit Dani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Singularity42 (talk) 10:23, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sanjayp3 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Singularity42 (talk) 15:44, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]