User talk:SanctityOfTheTraditionalFamilyUnit

September 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Troy Davis case. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 00:39, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please observe an neutral point of view.—Theda 14:27, 27 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SanctityOfTheTraditionalFamilyUnit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Given no reason and no particulars from which I may reply in defence

Decline reason:

This, this and this. The first two are violations of the biographies of living persons policy, which also applies to recently deceased persons. We can write that Davis was convicted of the crime. We cannot say what you wanted to say there, as Davis did not confess to the crime and whether he did commit it was, the verdict notwithstanding, a source of considerable dispute. As for the third, that's just regular old vandalism. I agree you should have been warned and notified of the reason for the block as policy requires. I will discuss this with the blocking admin. However, for the time being I consider the block justified. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by [[User:{{{1}}}|{{{1}}}]] ([[User talk:{{{1}}}|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/{{{1}}}|contribs]])

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SanctityOfTheTraditionalFamilyUnit (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The policy is explicitly stated not to apply to the dead. Nor has there ever been any doubt expressed by any judge or juror who formally ruled on the matter of his responsibility for what he proved to be justly executed for. I'm talking about judges, jurors and parole board members who permitted testing of his claims and assertions by a knowledgeable prosecution or adversary : not knownothing celebrities who wouldn't know the difference between a witness statement and a press statement of halftruths for the gullible.

Decline reason:

Sorry, the GNAA link makes your intentions here crystal clear. Kuru (talk) 11:53, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.