User talk:Samyo

indian culture, language and folklife are my most preferable topic.

Speedy deletion nomination of Sudhir Trehan

A tag has been placed on Sudhir Trehan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ttonyb (talk) 03:32, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Samyo. You have new messages at Ttonyb1's talk page.
Message added 17:31, 24 September 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Wikipedia:Meetup/Mumbai/Mumbai2

Hi ! As discussed in the Wikipedia:Meetup/Mumbai/Mumbai1 in September,2010, Wikipedians in Mumbai & Suburbs will meet up at least once every month, a Meet up

Wikipedia:Meetup/Mumbai/Mumbai2 has been organised on 10th Oct., 2010 to move the same further.

Would you be available to meet with us on Sun 10th Oct.?

Could u convey this to other attendees of Mumbai Meet up-1 or Mumbai Wikipedians? Regards. Angpradesh (talk) 04:12, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mumbai IX

As per your request to be notified of WikiMeet-ups in Mumbai, Mumbai IX has been announced and will take place on Saturday 23 April 2011 at 10.30am Railway station nearest to venue is CST Railway Station or Churchgate. Cheers, Around The Globe^{सत्यमेव जयते} 08:43, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mumbai XI

As per your request on this page:

Wikipedia–Wikimedia Meetup
Mumbai, India

Meetup - 26
विकिपीडिया मिलन,
मुंबई-26:उद्घोषित
4 p.m. ,
Saturday, 21 November 2015

(view .edit .changes)

A page you started (Banwarilal Sharma) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Banwarilal Sharma, Samyo!

Wikipedia editor Newrunner769 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

You need to separate your citations into exactly where they came from.

To reply, leave a comment on Newrunner769's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Banwarilal Sharma

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Banwarilal Sharma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/allahabad/Gandhian-activist-Prof-Banwarilal-Sharma-passes-away/articleshow/16560024.cms. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Solomon 7968 10:53, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mumbai Meetup: 21 Nov 2015

Hi, Meet-up for Mumbai Wikipedians has been scheduled on 21 Nov 2015 (Meet-up: Mumbai 21 Nov 2015). I request you to register for the meet. All details can be found on the meet-up page. Many thanks and hope to meet you on 21st Nov. Regards, Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 11:22, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Angika

Hi Samyo. Could you please explain why are you making unexplained modifications of sourced content and also adding WP :OR. Thanks. Jakichandan (talk) 03:19, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jakichandan ! It is you who are making unexplained modifications. You have made so many unexplained changes to several pages related to Angika languages. You are trying to show all the things in favour of Maithili Language . You're missing the point. WP:NPOV . Please mind your intention. Samyo (talk) 03:27, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Samyo: WP:V and WP :RS are important considerations in Wikipedia editing. We can't do WP:OR. Please WP :assume good faith. Thanks. Jakichandan (talk) 03:37, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Your recent editing history at Angika shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Drmies (talk) 04:39, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 00:21, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]