User talk:Samuelrclaesson

This is Samuelrclaesson's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boyd Magers (March 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Guessitsavis was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boyd Magers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 21:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added sources in nationally-syndicated newspapers per your request. These are not bias sources. Samuelrclaesson (talk) 21:32, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Samuelrclaesson! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 21:02, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boyd Magers (March 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

As before, really.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boyd Magers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 21:25, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added sources in nationally-syndicated newspapers per your request. Samuelrclaesson (talk) 21:30, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please use Wikipedia's functionality for on-wiki communication, please--not email. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 21:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can you elaborate on the comment "as before, really"? Samuelrclaesson (talk) 21:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your very first reference already doesn't discuss the subject of the article; it only cites him, briefly, as the author of a book. The "Poke Heroes" is an article in a local newspaper that mentions him as a collector. "Colorization" mentions his column--and that's sort of the point: it doesn't discuss him per se. Drmies (talk) 21:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't explain the meaning of your comment. It seemed like a passive-aggressive way of venting frustration. We appreciate the volunteers who help Wikipedia, but there's a certain decorum, temperament, and demeanor that's expected of you. Samuelrclaesson (talk) 21:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, good luck with it. Your "it seemed like" is--well, it's passive-aggressive in its own right. Drmies (talk) 00:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's not what passive-aggressive is. I was hoping that this would be an opportunity for you to learn from somebody who's had years of graduate and post-graduate education, but it doesn't seem you're willing to learn anything. I was a frequent donor to Wikipedia, but -with the unprofessionalism that you've exhibited- I won't be anymore. Samuelrclaesson (talk) 23:56, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Boyd Magers (March 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Guessitsavis was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb is not a reliable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Boyd Magers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 23:25, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jocelyn Benford moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Jocelyn Benford. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 20:16, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Eve Bernhardt moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Eve Bernhardt. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and needs more sources to fulfill either WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 11:31, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Jackie Gleason, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 20:25, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]