User talk:Samson of Normal

What a clever sleuth you must be, since I had no intention of hiding this. Which little devil are you? One of the LOUF no doubt. (Lurkers of unusual ferocity).Samson of Normal (talk) 21:38, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

SpigotMap

I expected to be blocked. But I'm wondering if it isn't a conflict of interest for SpigotMap to do it. They have deleted the converstation leading up the the block, but he was the instigator. I've been assuming others know what he's been doing on my talk page, but maybe not. He's been there trying to make me mad since I asked for a 3rd opinion on Virgin birth (mythology). He appeared on that discussion page in a suspicious way after I told Ari he couldn't threaten to block me from his own conversation. Then later he claimed to have come for the 3rd opinion. He was never impartial. I saw the same kind of thing when I first came to the Patriarchy article. You can see how he acted at Virgin birth. At one point he followed me to Patriarchy and did the same thing there. He and Ari have taken turns warning me for things I didn't do and he's been watching my talk page. Before this last thing, I couldn't say anything at all there without him following it up with some remark. You can see this on my archived page. I'd prefer not to have an answer here if will give them pleasure. And I'm not a sock or whatever. I haven't tried to hide who I am--if that is the definition, but they have blocked this account as well. Can you tell me if this is accepted here? Thanks. Hammy64000Samson of Normal (talk) 00:27, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

Sockpuppet investigations

I don't know if this will get to the right people--I don't see my name in the list. This was posted to [1]

I didn't try to hide who I was. My account is blocked. I replaced article content that Ari89 deleted. It was content that was in the original article, which I edited, so it was basically undoing vandalism, not the other way around. I made some comments on the discussion page and I did not try to hide who I was. The account, User talk:Samson of Normal was set up as a joke about SarekOfVulcan, who blocked my account in behalf of user talk:SpigotMap. It was only meant to be used on my own page, but SpigotMap has been watching my page (user talk:Hammy64000)since April and harrassing me there. Samson of Normal has not been used anywhere but my own pages.

Ari had no consensus to delete material or to do the original merge. He has reverted all repairs I attempted to do. Then the article was protected with his deletions in place. I thought the article was protected from him, so I was surprised that when I said I was quitting, the protection was taken off. By that time I was already blocked--I had decided to give up. It seemed to me that if people were asked to comment on an article that had been dismantled, they couldn't possibly make a good decision. So I attempted to replace 4 missing sections. (In April he merged Virgin birth (mythology) with Miraculous births. He then reverted any attempts I made to undo his changes, requested sources on material that already had sources, and deleted sources and content. The article is protected now and I haven't edited there in, I think, two days. They are supposed to be having a belated merge discussion, but Ari does not participate and is still free to make changes to the article. I have no intention of participating there now. I've already given all my arguments.) By the way, I can't even edit here if I sign on, so I have to sign manually. Samson of NormalSamson of Normal (talk) 06:48, 12 July 2010 (UTC)