User talk:Samee/Archives/2015/February
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Samee. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
18:12:32, 7 February 2015 review of submission by SukanyaBhawal
Hello! The draft I created has been rejected by you for some obvious and valid reasons. What I understand is that the problem is with citations and the tone of writing. I have tried to tone down the language as per the wiki guidelines. My problem area is the citation part. The person I am making this page for is a well-known actor in West Bengal, India but somehow the articles published about him in newspapers and magazines are pretty old and most of them do not have a website link. I can provide you with the scanned images of the paper-cuttings though, along with the newspapers' names and dates on which those articles were published for authenticity. But what I understand is that this will not help until there is a website link to those articles. Some of the movies mentioned in the draft are up on YouTube and DailyMotion as videos and I had tried to cite them but I am not sure if they will get accepted or not. Kindly guide me.
SukanyaBhawal (talk) 18:12, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
GA Cup Feedback Form
 Greetings, all! 4 months ago the GA Cup began and now as it comes to a close, it's time to start thinking about the next competition! Below is a link to a Google Form with several questions. We want to here from you what you thought about the GA Cup. Just over half of the questions are required while the others are optional. If you don't want to answer one of the optional questions, feel free to skip it. Your responses will only be visible to the three judges. Thank-you to all particpants for making the first GA Cup a success and we hope to see you all come out again for the next competition! Cheers from Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan. To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletter, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant still competing, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.
|
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
14:04:17, 13 February 2015 review of submission by Shebeezal
Have a few questions:
1. Why is someone still not "Notable" even after getting attention of the field experts and after critics' articles on his/her creative work have appeared in acclaimed national newspapers?
2. If it is not critics' reviews published in national newspapers, what else is the one conclusive proof that a poet or writer is notable?
3. Please help me understand how the notability of Ghazanfar Mehdi was ascertained, and what does that accepted article contain as a way of proof of notability that is lacking in this draft?
4. Please clearly indicate where references are not adequate so they could be improved or the relevant part of the article be deleted.
I have a number of other articles in mind that I wanted to add, but have stopped because don't want to waste time writing articles unless I know where my mistakes are. A true help is when you indicate where improvement is needed instead of summarily declining a draft.
Best Regards