User talk:Samar0a786

Welcome!

Hi Samar0a786! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 16:53, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Matarumal Collection

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Matarumal Collection, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. – NJD-DE (talk) 11:17, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 11:23, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samar0a786 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello sir/madam,

my account has been blocked as a sockpuppet that was created to violate wikipedia policy, i have no intention to go against Wikipedia policy, and my account is not a sockpuppet this is only controlled by me, my wikipedia account are logged in Smartphone and Laptop. If I have made any mistake then I apologize for that and promised to this never happens again, Please Unblock my account, and i request to you give me a first and last chance.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:28, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Samar0a786 (talk) 09:03, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samar0a786 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Okk. I Accepted it, i will not did any mistake ever again and my account is not a sockpuppet. Accept my Sorry Sir/Madam, :Give me a last chance. Samar0a786 (talk) 13:08, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed sockpuppet. This attempt to mislead us will count against you in any future unblock request. Yamla (talk) 14:28, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request to be unblocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Samar0a786 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello Sir/Madam, My account has been blocked as a sockpuppet that was created to violate wikipedia policy, I have no intention to go against Wikipedia policy. I apologize for that and promised to this never happens again, Please Unblock my account, and i request to you give me a first and last chance to prove myself.. Okk. I Accepted it, i will not did any mistake ever again and I accept my mistake. This happened when I didn't know about Wikipedia's Policy but now I know it won't happen again. Please Accept My Sorry Sir/Madam and Give me a Last Chance. Samar0a786 (talk) 09:14, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You had your last chance and blew it. Your only possible pathway forward here is the standard offer. 331dot (talk) 09:36, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.