User talk:Salgado96

Welcome!

Hello, Salgado96, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Salgado96, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! ttonyb1 (talk) 17:19, 7 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Walking cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Walking cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:42, 24 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

The article The Vancouver Boots (singer) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article, which appeared to be about a real person, individual animal, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 01:41, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Portal:Hoaxes, to Wikipedia as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. No, you are *not* "free now to create hoaxes about you on Wikipedia." NawlinWiki (talk) 01:44, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cher+Already+Been+There.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cher+Already+Been+There.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 00:39, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Teenage Dream (Katy Perry album). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yvesnimmo (talk) 17:58, 10 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Katy perry teenage dream cover

well, i am not blind... i bought the deluxe edition of the album, and that is the one without the title. please go to google and look for the cd on the hmv group. see the deluxe cover and the standard cover, thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Salgado96 (talk • contribs) 15:18, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say you were blind. hmv UK has the same cover for both the Standard and Deluxe Editions of Teenage Dream, as does hmv Canada, hmv Hong Kong, and hmv Japan, so I'm not really sure where you're seeing this. Yvesnimmo (talk) 15:49, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually the discussion on the talk page established that in some regions i.e. the UK, you can by the deluxe or standard edition with the cover with text or without. Therefore as the cover with text was released it is easier to explain that a cover exists without the text, than it is to explain that a cover with kandy-kane style text was also released. Per WP:NFCC more than one cover art is not allowed as the second one does not add significant contextual significance and does not convey more information than one cover alone does. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 14:15, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To sort the issue once and for all I've brough the discussion up here. Please not that unless there is a general consensus and agreement that the inclusion of two covers is correct only one cover should remain at the article. -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 14:39, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Teenage dream music sheet.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Teenage dream music sheet.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Yvesnimmo (talk) 18:47, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Final stroke - gomo.ogg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Final stroke - gomo.ogg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:50, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Final stroke music video.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Final stroke music video.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:53, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Sale el Sol. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Using one wikipedia article as a source for another is not allowed. Equally blogs like theprophetblog.net are not appropriate!!!! -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 | talk2me 15:42, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Bruce buckley reveal cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Bruce buckley reveal cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:30, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Madonna Hard Candy Box Deluxe Edition.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Madonna Hard Candy Box Deluxe Edition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Madonna Hard Candy Box Deluxe Edition.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Madonna Hard Candy Box Deluxe Edition.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:48, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Reveal (Bruce Buckley album)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Reveal (Bruce Buckley album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ironholds (talk) 16:15, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The inside of the room.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The inside of the room.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:04, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:From the inside physicall release cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:From the inside physicall release cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 05:20, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Milla at the Borderline London 1994..jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Milla at the Borderline London 1994..jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Novice7 | Talk 04:02, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Milla at conan obrien.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Milla at conan obrien.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Novice7 | Talk 04:02, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of The Divine Comedy (album)

The article The Divine Comedy (album) you nominated as a good article has failed . The article may be close to good article criteria, but there are some major changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If you feel this is a mistake, you can ask for reassessment. Novice7 | Talk 05:47, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Michael (album)

Please STOP labelling it as a studio album. If you READ the talk page you can quite clearly see that a consensus has been establised that the album is a Compilation album and NOT a studio album! If you persist on inserting information that consensus has clearly REJECTED you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me | Merry Christmas to all! 00:39, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why is it that every single time an editor correctly changes Michael from compilation to studio you guys always threaten to block them? This is why most editors are afraid to change Michael back to its correct form, studio album, but there are few of us who aren't afraid of you people. Chelo61 (talk) 05:58, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admins don't usually block editors for good faith attempts to improve an article. They may, however, block editors for edit-warring. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 21:34, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And by the way: It has been established on the talk page that it is a compilation album. Anyone who changes it to studio album is going against the established consensus. As you should know by now: going against an established consensus after the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle has been done and found that the bold change should not be included in the article is usually where you should stop. Barts1a | Talk to me | Yell at me | Merry Christmas to all! 23:19, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:M.I.A singing at Atlantico, Rome 2010.jpg

Hi there. Thanks for uploading this image. Would it be possible to upload this image to wikimedia commons with a detailed fair use rationale. The image can then be linked in the articles that use it from the commons? Thanks. Lifebonzza (talk) 20:08, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rumo ao sul sample.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rumo ao sul sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nao e um fado normal sample.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nao e um fado normal sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:44, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Leva-me aos Fados (album)

The article Leva-me aos Fados (album) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Leva-me aos Fados (album) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of said article. If you oppose this decision, you may ask for a reassessment. Adabow (talk · contribs) 10:07, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:M.I.A singing at Atlantico, Rome 2010.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:M.I.A singing at Atlantico, Rome 2010.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:09, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Okay Alright (Aurea song) for deletion

The article Okay Alright (Aurea song) is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Okay Alright (Aurea song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toolsavoid e (talk • contribs) 20:28, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Okay alright music video.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Okay alright music video.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MorganKevinJ^(talk) 20:36, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced the tag since you still did not provide a fair use rationale. This is required in addition to the fair use license tag. Please do not remove the speedy until you add a fair use rationale. If you have any questions feel free to ask on my talk page, MorganKevinJ^(talk) 01:40, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

"Busy for Me" and "Okay Alright"

Two song articles you've created, "Busy for Me" and "Okay Alright", appear to be by an artist without an article, and may be eligible for speedy deletion per CSD A9. Please take a moment to either link the recording artist in these articles, or create the article in question. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 00:45, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because I'm not the person who would be performing the actual deletion, I highly recommend that you add your explanation to the talk pages of both these articles to give the (possible) deletion-admin some indication of your plans. I can't guarantee that it will stop such a deletion though, because both of these articles are currently eligible for CSD A9, and very well could disappear at any moment. It might be a wise idea to move these articles into user-space draft, until you have the artist's article completed. -- WikHead (talk) 01:06, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your new Aurea article is looking good! - My concerns have been fully addressed. Happy editing :). -- WikHead (talk) 20:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Busy for me music video.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Busy for me music video.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:28, 8 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye Lullaby

Mind explaining this comment in your edit summary to me please: "whether fans like it or not." What are you trying to say here? The fact is, the album has yet to be released in many places, so how can it be said the album received negative reviews? The reviews so far seem to be quite mixed. ℥^nding·start 19:35, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You forgot to sign the post on my talk page. And yes, I get what you mean, but the album hasn't been released everywhere yet to really say whether or not it was well received. I'm currently working on expanding the lead a bit. ℥^nding·start 19:45, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please use the three ~'s to sign the talk page please. And I'm not sure that's really necessary right now, and I actually don't know how to upload them. You could ask Novice7, he's uploaded a lot of samples before. ℥^nding·start 19:54, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded the sample, but be sure to provide enough information on the song. Here's the sample. — Novice7 (talk) 03:51, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Are you gonna use the sample? —Novice7 (talk) 09:17, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Untitled Marilyn Manson album for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Untitled Marilyn Manson album is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Marilyn Manson album until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 18:10, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Aurea performing alive 2010.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Aurea performing alive 2010.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 19:13, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Marilyn Manson 2011.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Marilyn Manson 2011.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 19:18, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Slimmy at paredes de coura music festival.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Slimmy at paredes de coura music festival.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 19:20, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Gomo performming final stroke.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gomo performming final stroke.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 19:22, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Susana during a concert in alvaiazere for her pulsação tour.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Susana during a concert in alvaiazere for her pulsação tour.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 19:23, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Susana singing at radio comercial.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Susana singing at radio comercial.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 19:25, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Susana felix at radio comercial.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Susana felix at radio comercial.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --~ [ Scott M. Howard ] ~ [ Talk ]:[ Contribs ] ~ 19:26, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GAN

Hi! I appreciate you nominating articles for a GA, but fix the existing ones. There's Kylie Minogue's X, which you haven't touched at all. Please complete that first, and then move on to others. Thank you. Novice7 (talk) 03:52, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rebecca Black. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Don't do that again Novice7 (talk) 10:25, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Like a Prayer GAN

I would advice you to withdraw the nomination. I can see so many outstanding issues and original research that it will be quick-failed. There's no cohesion, no structure, no background development properly. Frankly, Like a Prayer deserves better than just a lengthy lead. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:16, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I just saw that you did not even contribute anything to the article. This is absolutely disgusting, and such a bad faith editing on your part. I'm removing the nomination. — Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:20, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Critical reception sections on album articles.

Don't make edits like this to any other album articles. Those table aren't there because they look good, it's a guideline for the project. Before you do things like that (changing tables, rearranging layouts, etc.) look and see why they are there in the first place. Album articles are usually set up like they are through the WikiProject Albums guidelines. Please read them. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 23:47, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eat Me, Drink Me PR

Hi there. I've provided some feedback at the peer review you requested, as has another editor. Please take a look. Seegoon (talk) 01:54, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Im going to ask that you stop nominating articles for WP:GA. Talk:Eat Me, Drink Me/GA2, Talk:Eat Me, Drink Me/GA1, Talk:The Golden Age of Grotesque/GA2 have all failed. You need to read and fully understand all of WP:MOS, WP:GA and Wikipedia:WIAGA#What_is_a_good_article.3F before you nominate any more articles. If you continue to do so and do not respond to this message your editing may be considered disruptive and you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. - (CK)Lakeshade - talk2me - 18:07, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  Ok, I'll read the articles you said. Salgado96 (talk) 20:58, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Good work reorganizing and rewriting those pages, however, you forgot to properly source them. Mansonwiki, The Nachtkabarett, etc. are not reliable (i.e. good enough) sources for Wikipedia. I have provided a couple of good ones on the talk page of The Golden Age of Grotesque. Also, don't forget to cite them (using the cite templates). That is a necessity to attain GA or FAC status. -Red marquis (talk) 21:53, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Mi Plan

The article Mi Plan you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Mi Plan for things which need to be addressed. Novice7 (talk) 10:35, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article has failed. Sorry. Novice7 (talk) 05:34, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Arma goddamn music video.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Arma goddamn music video.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 01:54, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Still inside your mind sample.ogg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Still inside your mind sample.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 04:53, 2 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA nomination for The Downward Spiral

Hi, I'm '| () () `'/ I> (talk). Can you nominate The Downward Spiral, an article about a Nine Inch Nails album, for Good Article status (read that article first before you do so)? I would be very super lucky if you did it. '| () () `'/ I> (talk) 07:01, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I finally read that fuckin' WP:GAN page. And by the way, your welcome. I will try to nominate it, but if it doesn't, I'll ask somebody to do so. '| () () `'/ I> (talk) 18:25, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And I did it. '| () () `'/ I> (talk) 18:40, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Slimmy

Hey Salgado, I'm afraid I don't have the song at the moment. I'll try to get it and will upload it soon. Novice7 (talk) 04:15, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Found the song. Here's the sample [1]. Novice7 (talk) 10:10, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much :) Salgado96 (talk) 21:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd love to review it, but editors much more experienced than me might be interested in reviewing the article. If nobody reviews it by Sunday, I'll do it :) Novice7 (talk) 04:00, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Be Someone Else for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Be Someone Else is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Be Someone Else until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. I Help, When I Can. ^[12] 18:43, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beatsound Loverboy Remixes.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beatsound Loverboy Remixes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:23, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Marilyn Manson album

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Untitled Marilyn Manson album, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wikibin.org/tags/guitarist.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:15, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Marilyn Manson's eighth studio album

Hello! Your submission of Christianity Manufactures Yesterday's Killers at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:39, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Leva-me aos Fados single.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Leva-me aos Fados single.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:02, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Heart shaped glasses music video.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Heart shaped glasses music video.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:40, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Heart shaped glasses music video.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Heart shaped glasses music video.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Beatsound Loverboy/GA1

Hi, I know that you didn't start the review, but procedurally this needs to be deleted so that WP:GAN doesn't show the article as being under review. If it is shown as being under review, then reviewers likely won't start a review. Please leave notes on the article talk page or use the note parameter of the GAN template. Looking at the article it seems to have few WP:RS, so I suggest you work on finding some. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:31, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image help

Hi Salgado96, I notice you seem to be having a little image trouble. Don't worry, it's a common problem here. If you upload any images which are subject to copyright you'll need to include a fair use rationale with each image. I recently came across one of your images over at a Katy Perry article and went ahead and did that for you here [2]. If you have any questions feel free to get a hold of me here or on my talk page and I'll do my best to help. Thanks!--Crossmr (talk) 00:31, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Mia xxxo video.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Mia xxxo video.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 14:34, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Beatsound Loverboy Studio album.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Beatsound Loverboy Studio album.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:28, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Radian cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Radian cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:15, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Reise, Reise (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to German, Acoustic, Amerika, Monotony, Production, EW, Single, Punk and America

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Poster susana.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Poster susana.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:26, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Poster gomo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Poster gomo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:27, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Katy Perry Teenage Dream alternate cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Katy Perry Teenage Dream alternate cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:06, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. When you recently edited Born Villain, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Birthday Party and Lifestyle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

No Reflection (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Beat, Manson, Break, Birthday Party, Chorus and Industrial

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:35, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Marilyn Manson performing at the Soundwave Festival in Adelaide, Australia, 3-03-2012.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Marilyn Manson performing at the Soundwave Festival in Adelaide, Australia, 3-03-2012.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 20:00, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Take One Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Take One Cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:03, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Um Pouco Mais.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Um Pouco Mais.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:04, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Pulsação.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Pulsação.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:04, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Born Villain (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Beat, Manson, Break, Birthday Party and Chorus

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Sim.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sim.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:26, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Finished With My Ex band performing on radio showcase.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Finished With My Ex band performing on radio showcase.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:21, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Finished With My Ex band performing on radio showcase.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Finished With My Ex band performing on radio showcase.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:58, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Salgado96. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 22:03, 29 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 22:03, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Finished With My Ex band performing on radio showcase.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Finished With My Ex band performing on radio showcase.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:04, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Salgado96. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 22:12, 29 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 22:12, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Salgado96. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 08:50, 30 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 08:50, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Riding A Dead Horse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Acoustic, Promotional, Monotone and Jack White

Finished With My Ex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to EP

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:17, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Rua da saudade art cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Rua da saudade art cover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:00, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Salgado96. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 23:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 23:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Salgado96. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 23:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 23:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Marilyn manson 2010.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Marilyn manson 2010.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Bulwersator (talk) 20:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Salgado96. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 14:45, 1 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 14:45, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Finished With My Ex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Release and Digital download

Riding A Dead Horse (song) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Monotone

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Finished with my ex band logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Finished with my ex band logo.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:23, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Salgado96. You have new messages at Stefan2's talk page.
Message added 20:26, 14 October 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Stefan2 (talk) 20:26, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Finished With My Ex (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Raw

Riding a Dead Horse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Raw

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:53, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Finished With My Ex for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Finished With My Ex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finished With My Ex (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:52, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Finished With My Ex's Untitled Forthcoming Album for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Finished With My Ex's Untitled Forthcoming Album is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Finished With My Ex's Untitled Forthcoming Album until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 14:21, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Finished With My Ex's Untitled Forthcoming Album, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Raw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Artwork cover for Finished With My Ex's single Politics Franchise Lovers.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Artwork cover for Finished With My Ex's single Politics Franchise Lovers.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:16, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Fwmx riding a dead horse ep cover.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Fwmx riding a dead horse ep cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:17, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Alternate cover of Riding a Dead Horse EP.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Alternate cover of Riding a Dead Horse EP.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Finished with my ex band logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Finished with my ex band logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 02:49, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Teenage dream screenshot.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Teenage dream screenshot.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 17:27, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Every Leaf for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Every Leaf is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Every Leaf until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 11:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Filipa azevedo cd.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Filipa azevedo cd.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:43, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Games You Play

The article The Games You Play has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No non-primary references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 11:35, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The game you play.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The game you play.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:42, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Latin music invitation

You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

I noticed that you have made contributions to Portuguese music articles and thought you might be interested. Erick (talk) 18:27, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Não e um fado normal.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Não e um fado normal.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:01, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Finished with my ex band members.jpg

The file File:Finished with my ex band members.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file, no foreseeable encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.