User talk:Sal2100/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Sal2100. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
Welcome!
Hello, Sal2100, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Larry Sharpe (politician). I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! JesseRafe (talk) 20:46, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Ken Armstrong (U.S. Coast Guard officer)
Hello, Sal2100
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Vermont and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Ken Armstrong (U.S. Coast Guard officer), should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ken Armstrong (U.S. Coast Guard officer).
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vermont}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Vermont (talk) 03:08, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Gary's concession speech
@Sal2100: I saw that you deleted my addition to Gary Johnson 2016 presidential campaign, because it wasn't his actual concession speech and the source wasn't RS. Can you tell me i can view Gary's (and possibly Stein's) concession speech online? When i added that i had searched for both Johnson and Stein's concession speeches, and the non-RS i used was the only result i found. By the way, it wasn't trolling, the source genuinely had me fooled. Koopinator (talk) 10:06, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
- I couldn't find it either just now, but I distinctly remember watching the video of Johnson's 2016 election night speech with Bill Weld on the internet a while back. I can assure you it was nothing at all like what the BuzzSaw piece "reported". The video now seems to have disappeared from the web, for whatever reason. Anyway, thanks for responding and clarifying. It's good to know that this was an honest mistake and not blantant trolling. Some of these satirical sites can be very clever, and can pass themselves off as legit if you're not careful. I guess it's a good reminder to vet the sources carefully, especially if they're not established and well-known publications, before using them to cite content on Wikipedia. When in doubt, it's always a good idea to check out the "about us" section.Sal2100 (talk) 20:42, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Sal2100
Thank you for creating Jo Jorgensen 2020 presidential campaign.
User:MJL, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for improving this article!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|MJL}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
–MJL ‐Talk‐☖ 18:29, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
"Joe Bishop-Henchman" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Joe Bishop-Henchman. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 8#Joe Bishop-Henchman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Tartan357 (Talk) 22:07, 8 August 2020 (UTC)
"Kim Ruff (politician)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Kim Ruff (politician). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 29#Kim Ruff (politician) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Tartan357 (Talk) 19:53, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
"Darryl W. Perry" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Darryl W. Perry. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 26#Darryl W. Perry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Tartan357 (Talk) 21:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
July 2021
Hi Sal2100! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Spike Cohen that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. ― Tartan357 Talk 21:14, 19 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
Archiving notice
Hey! During your moving of Talk:Barry Cooper (activist), you forgot to update the archive location. All you need to do is adjust the |archive=
parameter in the {{User:MiszaBot/Config}}
template to the new page name. Don't worry, I've fixed this for you. Just keep this in mind if you move a page in the future. Thanks! Aidan9382 (talk) 21:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for fixing my oversight. Sal2100 (talk) 21:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
"Darryl Perry" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Darryl Perry and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 25#Darryl Perry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 18:45, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
"Darryl W. Perry" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Darryl W. Perry and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 25#Darryl W. Perry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. TartarTorte 18:46, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
"Rebecca Rotzler" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Rebecca Rotzler and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 29#Rebecca Rotzler until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. signed, Rosguill talk 18:10, 29 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Hipal (talk) 19:15, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
The Minor Barnstar | ||
Thank you for your continued maintenance of articles regarding third-party political figures.
Minor edits are often-overlooked, but essential, contributions to Wikipedia. The Minor Barnstar is awarded for making minor edits of the utmost quality. Doughbo (talk) 22:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC) |