User talk:Sakakawean
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Sakakawean, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Mubadala Development Company. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:13, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
Citing
[edit]Please don't manually do citations by using the "Sup" coding. Please learn how to correctly do citations: Help:Referencing for beginners
Ping me if you have any questions --Jennica✿ talk / contribs 00:20, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi Jennica,
thanks for your edits. i am very new at this but would love to learn from you. with regards to the references and how this hould be done. ithink i understnd how to do the reference but not sure how to do the refernce list at the end. it is not visble to me?
@Sakakawean: - here's a video. and also don't forget to leave edit summaries --Jennica✿ talk / contribs 12:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
anyway, it would be good if we in the title don't lose the fact that it is an official government report the SOU its number and the link to the Wiki-page etc. using just the title of the report doesnt really give it the same credibility, also it is in swedish which doesnt say much to most people.
somewhat same issue with the second reference, where it is the author (a government minister) and possibly the source that gives it some credibility. or what do you think
Speedy deletion nomination of Henrik von Gerber
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Henrik von Gerber requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mr. Vernon (talk) 17:25, 26 November 2016 (UTC)
April 2019
[edit]Your addition to Dag Detter has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Nat Gertler (talk) 17:53, 4 April 2019 (UTC)
A page you started (Ian Ball (accountant)) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Ian Ball (accountant).
I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Hello! Please fill out more information about your web references to avoid WP:LINKROT (it happens all the time, there are currently 217,700 articles with dead links that keep us from verifying the information the citations intended to support). Happy editing!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ajpolino}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Ajpolino (talk) 17:29, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest
[edit]One or more persons with “an undisclosed connection to” Stefan Fölster and Dag Detter are editing the articles about these two people, their book The Public Wealth of Nations, and other articles associated with their work. This is an “apparent COI”. The person or persons are using the accounts Hollyeighteen, Sakakawean, Tigerinthesmoke, and Timeforteapet. As a sanction against this person or persons, I shall
- Post this notice on the talk pages of the most important affected articles.
- Post a notice on WP:COIN.
- Delete most of the contents of these articles, since the users mentioned above use Wikipedia to promote two people and their work in clear breach of rules pertaining to COI.
Min hemliga identitet (talk) 12:45, 1 February 2020 (UTC)
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Min hemliga identitet (talk • contribs) 10:29, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hollyeighteen, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented his evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Min hemliga identitet (talk) 07:40, 4 February 2020 (UTC)