Jump to content

User talk:Saimari

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

June 2021

[edit]

What previous account or accounts have you used before this one? JBW (talk) 22:20, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I think you didn't say hi, I didn't understand what you mean in your question, what is its purpose, please explain further. Saimari (talk) 00:05, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
What I meant was that I would like to know what previous account or accounts you have used. The purpose of the question was to enable me to review all of your edits, not just those made from the present account. JBW (talk) 20:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Iraq Division Two moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Iraq Division Two, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 21:21, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you in such a hurry? I ask you to return the article to where it was, and give me a few days to add sufficient sources to it. Thank you.Saimari (talk) 21:41, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 Al-Mina'a SC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ali Saad. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Balad SC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balad District.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Al-Dair SC for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Al-Dair SC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Dair SC until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nehme1499 21:39, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what the point of discussion is when the decision has already been made, and it was in vain to explain the reasons, and in vain to try to develop the article. What hurts the most is the waste of time and effort. Saimari (talk) 20:42, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Notice

The article Al-Muwafaqiya FC has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find enough in-depth coverage to pass WP:GNG, and nothing indicates it passes WP:FOOTYN. Would have redirected to the league, but an article for that league does not exist.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 TT me 21:04, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Moody2019 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Moody2019. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mz7 (talk) 05:29, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saimari (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

This is unfair, I don't understand why I'm linked to other accounts that have nothing to do with me, what offense I did and I never bothered anyone, please lift the block and show some respect for me, and respect for the work I do here. Saimari (talk) 13:38, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block, meaning it is supported with technical evidence, so sockpuppetry is not in doubt. Furthermore, the SPI also has the nontechnical basis of the block. If you are not a sockpuppet(or a meatpuppet) you will need to provide a plausible reason as to why technical and other evidence would indicate otherwise. 331dot (talk) 20:34, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020–21 Iraq Division One, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hassan Mohammed.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Goodbye

[edit]

There seems to be no way to prove that I am innocent even though there is no evidence to convict me, but as long as I cannot defend myself for being blocked for no reason, I say to everyone: Goodbye. Saimari (talk) 23:02, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Iraq Division Two

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Saimari. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Iraq Division Two, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Iraq Division Two

[edit]

Hello, Saimari. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Iraq Division Two".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:42, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]