User talk:Sai317

Welcome!

Hello everyone. Thanks for contacting me. I will read every message I get, so please comment to me. Sai317 (talk) 17:32, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sai317. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Basalisk ^{inspect damage}⁄_berate 21:38, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sai317 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sockpuppetry? This is a misunderstanding. I wasn't trying to fool anyone. This is my only account, BUT I forgot my password a while ago so I made a new one. That might be why. Seriously, you misunderstood. The block is not necessary to prevent any damage or disruption. For the disruptions, I took the warning already, and I didn't (and won't) do it again. I stopped removing editors comments (they're recorded anyway, so it shouldn't matter), only improving minor things now, like adding sources(which was being asked for), grammar fixes, clarifications, etc. Maybe it's too much of those edits? If that's the case, then I understand what I am blocked for. But I'm not trying to "fool" anyone, I am not trying to hide anything. If it's perceived that way, then give me a 2nd chance because it's a misunderstanding. Sai317 (talk) 22:06, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't think you're being completely straightforward here. You've had this account for rather a while. You were IP editing; no big deal. Then the IP got warned for bad behavior (talk page blanking); you immediately created User:Zebusadams, who proceeded to do exactly the same thing; and then as soon as you were warned on that account, you retrieved your password for this account. shall we request again, directly and straightforward? --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 23:23, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sai317 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK, so the block was for removing editors' comments, I understand now... "Then the IP got warned for bad behavior"... The IP didn't get warned (or at least I didn't see it)... "you immediately created User:Zebusadams"... No, I didn't. But, I think I understand why I got blocked now: It's because of what I did on the Zebusadams. Sai317 was warned once. I DIDN'T see the IP warning... However, Zebusadams was warned MULTIPLE times and did not stop until the final warning. I have no excuse for that. I'm sorry. However, when I got the "final warning", I stopped. So please give me a second chance. I promise that I won't do it again. That "final warning" on Zebusadams stopped me. And I did not have this account for a while, I only had it since yesterday night. So please, I stopped deleting comments after the "final" Zebusadams warning. And, I know the edits are for all to see: So I'm not hiding anything. I won't let you down, trust me. Sai317 (talk) 6:01 pm, 27 January 2013, last Sunday (7 days ago) (UTC−6)

Decline reason:

Your block is for sockpuppetry. Being deceptive in your unblock requests (no, I do not believe that you forgot your password and then suddenly remembered it after your new account was warned for misbehavior) is why you're staying blocked. Danger ^{High voltage!} 03:45, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.