User talk:Saheehinfo/Archives/2016/April
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Saheehinfo. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Disambiguation link notification for April 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mawlid, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moroccan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 6 April 2016 (UTC)
Apology
Before you read any of my edits or comments, I honestly do owe you an apology for the edit summary in my last edit to the bid'ah article. My language was dickish and impolite, and it was uncalled for. I don't know why I wrote like that, but it was flippant and mainly a result of not considering it that well. You seem like a standup editor and a person inclined to actually work with others and you don't deserve that. I sincerely hope that you'll be able to accept me saying I'm sorry. MezzoMezzo (talk) 12:02, 11 April 2016 (UTC)
- @MezzoMezzo:, thanks for the apology - it's not a big deal. I would be happy to work with you and other editors to improve the Bidah article in the near future, though I am unfortunately still busy today. Saheeh Info 18:42, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
- I wish you all the best in handling real life - Wikipedia is, technically, just a hobby. Maybe give a shout out once you return; until then, there are always other articles that need to be edited and created. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:42, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
Third opinion
A third opinion has been sought here. --Mawlidman (talk) 10:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Dispute resolution
I have submitted the DR here: Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard#Talk:Mawlid#Consensus doesn't exist concerning falsehood. --Mawlidman (talk) 03:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)