Jump to content

User talk:Saghias

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2007

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, an article you recently created, Brad R. Roth, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Jonomacdrones 17:58, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]


The article Mamade Kadreebux has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 13:14, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Saghias! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Brad R. Roth - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 18:39, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Source information needed for File:Mansoor-ijaz-video 200.jpg

[edit]

Hello, Saghias!

It was really helpful of you to upload File:Mansoor-ijaz-video 200.jpg. However, in order to keep and use new images, we need to know their original source.

If you can edit the description page and add this information, that would be great. If you're not sure how or need help, please ask at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Source information needed for File:Aamir Liaquat.png

[edit]

Hello, Saghias!

It was really helpful of you to upload File:Aamir Liaquat.png. However, in order to keep and use new images, we need to know their original source.

If you can edit the description page and add this information, that would be great. If you're not sure how or need help, please ask at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:07, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Aamir Liaquat.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Aamir Liaquat.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:43, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

[edit]

Hello, I'm Dawnseeker2000. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Asra Nomani, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I've removed it for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 20:21, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Asra Nomani. Thank you. Jayjg (talk) 20:34, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My contribution to Nomani page has a reliable source. The letter to the editor that I have referenced appeared in Pakistan's most respected English newspaper. One can reasonably assume that editors of Dawn will not publish frivolous material. There is no general rule about using letters to the editor. There is ample conversation about this issue in the blogosphere and there is no response to the letter's claims. The letter itself provides a careful description of Shibli Nomani's descendants. Just as Nomani "states" that she is a descendent of Shibli Nomani, the letter's author "rejects" that claim. There is nothing controversial about the fact that Asra Nomani has made the claim, and similarly there is nothing controversial about the fact that people have rejected that claim. The reader can draw her own conclusion. saghias
A Letter to the Editor is not considered a Reliable Source on English Wikipedia. Please carefully read WP:BLP, as I would hate for you to be blocked. Jayjg (talk) 20:56, 21 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]