Jump to content

User talk:Safwweferules

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Safwweferules (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Even if you block me and protect this page, I'll just come back again with new accounts. Safwweferules (talk) 19:17, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Which is why you're blocked, so stay away. --jpgordon::==( o ) 19:54, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Safwweferules (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am actually not Safwwefe. I only made this account and said I was Safwwefe to see what the reaction would be like if a long-banned users shows up again. I saw Safweefe's name on the list of banned users and felt the history of Safwwefe was funny. Safwweferules (talk) 20:23, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Regardless, it has been proven that you are abusing multiple accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 16:16, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Safwweferules (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

How has it been proven that I am abusing multiple accounts? This IS my only account. The checkuser showed that Safwwefe was abusing multiple accounts, not me! I only went to the list of banned users and made an account saying I was Safwwefe to see what the reaction would be like. I checked the block log of Safwwefe to determine the 3 administrators I would message. I am not Safwwefe, this is my only account, and please unblock me so that I can make productive edits from now on. I can request to get my username changed if you feel the similar username to Safwwefe would be disruptive. Safwweferules (talk) 21:36, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT is practically the worst way to handle an unblock request, especially when you've been blocked for sockpuppetry. — Daniel Case (talk) 12:02, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What "all the accounts you're currently using" are you talking about. I am not Safwwefe like I claimed before, and this is my only account.