User talk:Sadiqahmad122

Welcome!

Hello, Sadiqahmad122, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sadiq Ahmad, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —teb728 t c 08:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sadiqahmad122 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The latest block log entry is provided below for reference: *.04:13, 15 November 2015 Drmies blocked Sadiqahmad122 (account creation blocked)(Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia Please Unbolck me for editing my first article

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:50, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sadiqahmad122 (talk) 11:48, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sadiqahmad122 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I trusting on wikipedia, because wikipedia is a trustable website, please unblock me to edit my first article Sadiq Ahmad Dawar

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is a trustable website in part because we make an effort to stop people misusing it as a Facebook substitute. MER-C 17:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi. Looking at the messages below, it seems clear that you were blocked for repeatedly creating an article about yourself (when you are not sufficiently notable to have one), so I really don't think that asking to be unblocked so that you can do it again is going to get you unblocked. If you want an admin to unblock you, you're going to have to make it clear that you understand why you were blocked and that you will not continue the same behavior. 823510731 (talk) 12:38, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sadiqahmad122 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I trusting on wikipedia, because wikipedia is a trustable website, I have requsted many times, please unblock me to edit my first article Sadiq Ahmad Dawar

Decline reason:

You are not allowed to write about yourself here. What else do you want to write about? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 22:21, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sadiqahmad122 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I M requesting to an administrator to unblock me because the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia because I understand that for what purpose I have been blocked. I will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and I will make useful contributions instead. I know now, to how contribuete the encyclopedia to Wikipedia. Please unblock me, them I will able to edit, and create articles.

Please include a decline or accept reason.

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of Sadiq Ahmad

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sadiq Ahmad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —teb728 t c 08:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please do not write or add to an article about yourself, as you apparently did at Sadiq Ahmad. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to an existing article about yourself, please propose the changes on its talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was my page deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss it with the deleting administrator. Thank you. —teb728 t c 08:09, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sadiq ahmad

Hello Sadiqahmad122,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sadiq ahmad for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. MarkYabloko 11:04, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Khandawar

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Khandawar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —teb728 t c 11:14, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sadiq Ahmad

Hello Sadiqahmad122,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sadiq Ahmad for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 02:30, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sadiq Ahmad

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sadiq Ahmad requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 02:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Sadiq Ahmad. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. reddogsix (talk) 02:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Sadiq Ahmad, you may be blocked from editing. —teb728 t c 03:54, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Sadiq Ahmad. —teb728 t c 04:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Sadiq Ahmad. Lor^Talk 04:08, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 04:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Sadiq Ahmad 2015.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Sadiq Ahmad 2015.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mlpearc (open channel) 04:34, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sadiqahmad122 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblock me because I know that how to contribute to Wikipedia ,I read the Wikipedia guidelines and Carefully knows that for what I have been blocked. Next time I will not to continue to damage or disruption to Wikipedia. Please sir unblock me to make the contributions instead.Sadiqahmad122 (talk) 15:24, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Only one block request at a time, please.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sadiqahmad122 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please sir unblock me, I know that for what I have been blocked I was created another account on wikipedia. Extremely Sorry sir I was created the account because my that account was blocked and I will not create any other account, Please sir I don't want to use my other account wiki.riteme.site/wiki/user:sadiq Dawar Please Sir give me a chance once. the block is not necessary any more to prevent the Wikipedia. I will never continue to use another account and I will make the useful Contributions instead. Thanks Sadiqahmad122 (talk) 15:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No, you were blocked for disruptive editing, by repeatedly trying to create an article about yourself. As you are not notable in Wikipedia terms this is not acceptable. The fact that you have now told us of a second account is a further reason to keep the block in place. If unblocked, what do you want to write about. Give a simple, clear and unambiguous answer.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 19:40, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sadiqahmad122 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir if you unblock me then I would want create articles about a persons like Politicians, actors, film directors etc. I wouldn't go to create an article about myself or not notable persons under the wikipedia terms. I will only create articles about a notable work. Now I clearly know that what to be contribute to wikipedia. Please sir give me a chance then see. I wouldn't damage the wikipedia. Promise.103.255.6.82 (talk) 05:41, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Anthony Bradbury asked for a "simple, clear and unambiguous answer". I do not think "a persons like Politicians, actors, film directors etc." meets that standard. If you could point out a specific, clearly notable topic you want to write about, that may help. Right now I feel that if you were unblocked, the "notable work" you want to write about would turn out to happen to be your own. Huon (talk) 09:05, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.