User talk:Sad9721
Vandalism on List of European countries by average wage
[edit] | PLEASE, STOP Please stop vandalizing this article and reverting or editing correct editions with false/untrustful editions. You're changing the sources with the source istat.it which is the main website of ISTAT, but the numbers that you put can't be proved in any part of the istat's website. Also if you seek anything related to 2033, 2.033 or 2,033 and Italy in Google nothing appears. That means that you're inventing data, the same as in the page of Economy of Italy where you changed the annual salary for an invented number and you even didn't put any source. This is your last chance. You've waited some months to be a semi-confirmed user just to be able to edit the page of the wages. I will not warn you more times. Next time, an administrator will be contacted and you will be temporary blocked from further edits in Wikipedia; this applies to your account and IP. Regards, and please, improve the wikipedia as other users. Don't do those things. |
--TechnicianGB (talk) 11:36, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
You are posting a not official national source.It must be bannedSad9721 (talk) 13:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of European countries by average wage, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop vandalising this page. If you do not calmly discuss on the talk page what you think should be changed and provide a suitable reference, then I will request that an admin bans you. Absolutelypuremilk (talk) 14:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
You are reverting voracious edits with trustworthy sources with redundant sources, "istat.it" is the main website of Italian statistics, but it's not saying anything about any average wage. Search inside istat those numbers and you will be ok, but in the source "istat.it" this information can't be checked so it makes it a redundant source.
Please understand this, Wikipedia is a place for voracious information and a place where we all want to improve it. If you don't want to improve Wikipedia, please do anything else. But don't revert anyother's work because you don't agree with it.
Breaking the 3 revert rule (Wikipedia:Three revert rule enforcement) may end in a temporal ban of your Wikipedia account. This is the 2nd time that you revert voracious changes with trustwhorthy data putting redundant sources which aren't showing any data. If you revert again any voracious edit, you will be breaking the 3RR of Wikipedia. Regards --HardstyleGB (talk) 17:41, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
You are posting not official data in wages article.You can find them for Italy only in ISTAT data.Sad9721 (talk) 17:43, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 11 July
[edit]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the List of European countries by average wage page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:29, 12 July 2016 (UTC) Thank you.Sad9721 (talk) 08:00, 12 July 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 23 July
[edit] Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the List of European countries by average wage page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
July 2016
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 17:27, 24 July 2016 (UTC)Warning crossposted from my page
[edit]It's actually quite strange to me that you simply went on making the same edits that you were blocked for when the block expired. People have explained to you again and again that you must give a reference where the reader can see the figures you give. You don't give a reference at all in the article — you just remove the Forex reference, replacing it with nothing, and when discussing on talk, you say the reference must be istat.it. That's a big site, not a reference showing your figures. You're new, and I'm sure people would be willing to help you find the proper reference, but in fact nobody has been able to locate the figure you give at istat.it. You don't seem to hear what they tell you. I'll give you one last chance: find the url at istat.it that proves what you say, and put it either on the article or its talkpage — or feel free to put it on my page, if you like. If you continue to edit in the same way without providing this url, you will be blocked for a longer period. Please try to get your head round what you've been told. Don't edit again until you understand it. This is your last chance. Bishonen | talk 08:14, 26 July 2016 (UTC).
- And you didn't take that last chance, but charged ahead. I've blocked you, see below. Bishonen | talk 09:57, 26 July 2016 (UTC).
July 2016
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | talk 10:00, 26 July 2016 (UTC)- If you request unblock and do show some understanding of what the problem is, you may be unblocked. This block is basically because nobody's getting through to you despite many efforts. Bishonen | talk 10:01, 26 July 2016 (UTC).
- Note: since this individual immediately started evading their block from IPs (151.40.22.202 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) and 151.40.73.239 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) so far), I now advise against unblocking them in any case. Bishonen | talk 16:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC).