User talk:Sacredsf

Welcome!

Hello, Sacredsf, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! shoy (reactions) 18:55, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Thanks shoy and thanks for the welcome! I've taken some advice of from other Wikipedians (Bkissin) and merged existing articles Stuart Hall for Boys, Convent of the Sacred Heart Elementary School, and Stuart Hall High School into Convent of the Sacred Heart High School (California). From there I wanted to update the title of Convent of the Sacred Heart High School (California) to Convent & Stuart Hall as it more accurately describes the school (per the website). Want to make sure I'm following the rules and correct protocol so I'd greatly appreciate any extra eyes on this process! Sacredsf (talk) 21:06, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

At a very quick glance I see three issues. Two of those have been outlined by Shoy above: Firstly, when you're writing about "schools of the Sacret Heart in San Francisco", then your username User:Sacredsf skirts the boundaries of the username policy, particularly because it may be seen as representing an organization and thereby implying shared use. Secondly, if you work for those schools and edit Wikipedia as part of your job, then you will need to disclose that; see WP:Paid-contribution disclosure for details on the disclosure requirements. Thirdly, the article is indeed under the correct title, but it's blatantly promotional and reproduces content copy-pasted from the school website as Wikipedia's own voice. That's not just inappropriate for an encyclopedia, it also raises copyright issues. I'll try and remove the copy-pasted content; we'll have to see whether a meaningful article remains. Huon (talk) 22:27, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clearing that up Huon. I went ahead and disclosed that I am indeed a paid contributor on my Userpage. I apologize about the copyright issues, I thought by citing sources for the text was enough, but now realize that none of the word-for-word text was put in quotations and is therefore plagiarized. I can assure you that I am the only person using this account and have communicated with others that they will need to create an account of their own should they wish to create edits. I apologize for the "promotional" language as that was not my intent. My goal is only to ensure that the article about the organization is factually correct and up to date. I will try again and would appreciate any feedback/tips you could provide. Sacredsf (talk) 19:12, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I should note (and I did note on my user talk page in reply to Trackinfo) that some copyright problems were present in the page before you ever edited it. If your edits had been the only problem, cleanup would have been quick and easy; those other issues, likely undetected for years, were worse. My general advice for article-writing is to find reliable third-party sources such as newspapers or reputable magazines that discuss the schools in some detail, and to neutrally summarize (in your own words, to avoid copyright problems) what those sources report. Huon (talk) 20:09, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Convent & Stuart Hall (March 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bkissin were:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Convent of the Sacred Heart Elementary School instead.

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Stuart Hall for Boys. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Both articles already exist. Merge this information into the existing articles.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Convent & Stuart Hall and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Convent & Stuart Hall, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and will be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bkissin (talk) 19:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sacredsf! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bkissin (talk) 19:22, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Convent & Stuart Hall

When you merged into Convent & Stuart Hall, it set off a chain reaction that resulted in all of the articles getting deleted by other editors. The main reason for the deletion was WP:COPYVIO. Whoever created the original article, copied it word for word, not as a short quote. Deleting the articles set off an alarm with me, high schools don't disappear or become non-notable.

In my research, each high school has achieved notability separately, Convent back to 1887, Stuart Hall to 1956 I believe and then the merger. Each has a story to tell. We don't let contemporary developments obliterate history. There are old ladies still alive diplomas stating they graduated from Convent, with no mention of Stuart Hall and vice versa. I got the articles started, in what is called original prose. I reworded based on multiple pages of information.

I know there is a lot more to tell. I consider what I did as low hanging fruit to get things started. Judging by your handle, you probably can help tell it far better than I. But do it in your own words, supported by the sources, not verbatim quotes of multiple paragraphs. Watch out also for WP:COI. Trackinfo (talk) 08:51, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]