User talk:Sac lock

March 2015

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Sachin G Lokapure. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 12:40, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your Username

Welcome to Wikipedia. I saw that you edited or created Sachin G Lokapure, and I noticed that your username, "Sac lock", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87".

Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a username change that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Jerodlycett (talk) 14:42, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sachin G Lokapure, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Wgolf (talk) 17:29, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:55, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sac lock (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

unknowingly another talk is opened for this article unfortunately it affect notable article hence please unblock it, as we add some other information reference in said article117.200.189.52 (talk) 03:00, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your unblock request makes no sense. English language competency is required to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. You are also required to log in to make further requests. MER-C 11:25, 27 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.