Jump to content

User talk:Sabah Azman Nahean

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hey! I'm not Jaed Ali! He's plotting, and you believe that I'm using multiple identities?! Unbelievable! I will never forgive you for that! I am Javed Ali and Sabah Azman Nahean but not him! He is a liar!

Hello! Are you here! An innocent man want to talk with you!

February 2019

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Kyrgyzstan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:43, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Block

[edit]

I'm not Jaed Ali. He's plotting against me so that you can block me. Please unblock me. I'm not a sock puppet. I swear! Sabah Azman Nahean (talk) 22:49, 11 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppetry

[edit]

Mr. Oshwah! I need to talk with you. I'm not a sock puppet. The 'Nerd' Jaed is a fraud! Just for him you made me sock puppet and blocked me. I am waiting for your answer. Please unblock me and block Jaed forever. Because he is a bad person. Hope you'll take a good step. Sabah Azman Nahean (talk) 15:55, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Mr. Oshwah! One year has been gone one month ago, but you did not unblocked me! Please believe me, I am not a sock puppet! He is a bad person! I am truly innocent! Sabah Azman Nahean (talk)

Unblock request

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sabah Azman Nahean (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I will never make a mistake like sockpuppetry again.

Decline reason:

Having read through this talk page and Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jaed Ali/Archive, I think a more compelling description of intended constructive edits and/or a to-the-point explanation and disavowal of past erratic behavior is necessary here signed, Rosguill talk 19:09, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sir @Oshwah, I humbly apologize for the mistake I made and I am ashamed of that. I promise I will never do sockpuppetry again. I want a chance to prove my promise. I won't let you down. Sabah Azman Nahean (talk) 17:52, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request 2.0

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Sabah Azman Nahean (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am requesting to be unblocked because I understand my previous actions related to sockpuppetry were inappropriate, and I sincerely apologize for that. I admit that my behavior was not in line with Wikipedia's guidelines. Moving forward, I plan to improve any article by adding reliable sources and enhancing its content. I also intend to create and expand articles on any topic that need more attention. I will actively participate in discussions on talk pages to collaborate with other editors. I assure you that I will not engage in sockpuppetry again and am committed to following Wikipedia's policies.

Accept reason:

Accepted per discussion below, with an indefinite one-account restriction. Girth Summit (blether) 15:55, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sabah Azman Nahean (talk) 05:27, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jaed Ali is the older account, and the one with more edits, so as we define these terms here this is the sockpuppet account. I don't have a problem with unblocking you, as far as I can see all you are guilty of is a certain amount of messing about five years ago, but I'd rather unblock the original (older) account rather than this one - do you still have access to it? Girth Summit (blether) 13:35, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No. Though this account has been blocked as sockpuppet, this is my original account and my original name with Google account I attached. I have no access in Jaed Ali account, I have no account named 'Jaed Ali' in other sites. So, if Jaed Ali account gets unblocked, I may never access in Wikipedia. Sabah Azman Nahean (talk) 03:34, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough. Oshwah - you're the blocking admin, do you have any objections to an unblock per WP:SO and WP:ROPE? I don't see anything particularly egregious in their history from 5 years ago, just some messing about that wasted people's time which they've apologised for. Girth Summit (blether) 09:02, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Girth Summit - I'm a big believer in WP:ROPE, so - nope, go for it! :-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks Oshwah. Sabah Azman Nahean: I'll accept your unblock request, but I will need you to accept that you will be restricted to one account moving forward. I will log that as a voluntary restriction, but note that the word 'voluntary' means that you're entering into it voluntarily as an unblock condition, not that abiding by it is voluntary. Please indicate that you accept this before we move forward (and please ping me when you do so, so I don't forget to come back and unblock you!). Also, I strongly advise against any more messing about, and don't go pestering StraussInTheHouse - agreed? Girth Summit (blether) 16:56, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Girth Summit, Thank you for considering my unblock request. I accept the condition of being restricted to one account moving forward. I understand this is a serious requirement, and I am committed to following it. Sabah Azman Nahean (talk) 18:32, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I've logged your editing restriction at Wikipedia:Editing restrictions/Voluntary. Provided you stick to one account, you're free to edit constructively wherever you like. Best wishes. Girth Summit (blether) 16:02, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]