User talk:Saaduddin2020

March 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Draft:Muhammad Saad Uddin. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 21:55, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Saad Uddin (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SamHolt6 were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks sufficient coverage to meet WP:BIO. In addition, note that Linkedin and Everypedia are not reliable sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muhammad Saad Uddin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Muhammad Saad Uddin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 22:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Saaduddin2020! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 22:09, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muhammad Saad Uddin (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Passengerpigeon was:

The article requires more references to independent and reliable sources, i.e. those not connected with the company for which Muhammad works or the television industry, to establish the notability of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Muhammad Saad Uddin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Muhammad Saad Uddin, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Passenger pigeon (talk) 07:51, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Passengerpigeon

Hello, Saaduddin2020. You have new messages at Passengerpigeon's talk page.
Message added 08:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Passenger pigeon (talk) 08:16, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saaduddin20, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Passenger pigeon (talk) 10:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Muhammad, I am very sorry about this, but I found out through the deleted page Muhammad Saad Uddin that you have been using multiple accounts in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy. Due to this, I have had to report you. I do not mean to discourage you from contributing to Wikipedia, but if you wish to edit again, you must go through the official unblocking policy in order to do so rather than evading blocks by creating multiple accounts. Passenger pigeon (talk) 10:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Passengerpigeon

Hello, Saaduddin2020. You have new messages at Passengerpigeon's talk page.
Message added 10:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Passenger pigeon (talk) 10:46, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Saaduddin20 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Cabayi (talk) 11:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Passengerpigeon

Hello, Saaduddin2020. You have new messages at Passengerpigeon's talk page.
Message added 11:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Passenger pigeon (talk) 11:17, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Saaduddin2020 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

basically i want to explain you something about the article which was deleted my times by wikipedia SEE TV because our employees were trying to re-make our company article on wikipedia because in 2015 to 2018, someone created our company article See TV with some wrong information and he was trying to challange us a fake leadership which was definitely creating problem and damaged our company name in the pakistan satellite television channel market. that's why i want to request you to give me 1 more change to create our company article again with the name SEE TV and i promise that i will not do the same mistake that i did in past. Saaduddin2020 (talk) 11:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No part of this unblock request is acceptable. You don't address your sockpuppetry. You think your violations of WP:COI are okay. You threaten to continue violating WP:COI and WP:PROMO. No. For that matter, you aren't even eligible for unblock consideration here, go make your request on your original account. But you'll want to read WP:GAB and all the policies we've linked you to, because unblock requests like this are just wasting our time. Yamla (talk) 11:41, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(Non-administrator comment) Please log in as User:Saaduddin20 and post your unblock request on that user talk page; you will have to use your original account if you wish to edit again and abandon all sockpuppets. Passenger pigeon (talk) 11:35, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Seeking an unblock

Hello Muhammad,

Since no administrators have been forthcoming with the details, if you wish to return to good standing within the Wikipedia community and seek an unblock, please read the page WP:STANDARDOFFER to learn more about the conditions required for getting unblocked. Then, place the following template on the talk page of your original user account, User:Saaduddin20 (you will have to abandon this account and all other sockpuppets if you are unblocked):

An admin will subsequently review your request and then decide how to proceed. Thank you, Passenger pigeon (talk) 11:28, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]