User talk:STURMMANN16

August 2022

Hello, I'm Loafiewa. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, AGS-30, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Loafiewa (talk) 20:20, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the same. I couldn't find any info whatsoever about Bulgaria ever operating it. Ivan 6 (talk) 23:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgarian Air Force

PLEASE STOP your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Bulgarian Air Force, you will be blocked from editing - Note you source does NOT have a signed contract for the additional eight F-16's FOX 52 ^talk! 20:12, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dude,are you even Bulgarian or do i have to explain to you too? STURMMANN16 (talk) 20:58, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No being Bulgarian has nothing to do with it, you need to know Wikipedia NOT a News site we only input contract signed deals - not things that may or may not pass though Parliamentary red tape. WP:NOTNEWS - FOX 52 ^talk! 06:28, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dude,here before a contract is signed it has to go through the parliament and get approved by MPs, After a contract has been approved by MPs the minister has a green light to sign a contract.So please stop writing lies about my own country . STURMMANN16 (talk) 13:47, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

You did not identify the source of the material in your edit. It appears to be Second Borisov Government. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I have done that for you this time.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.S Philbrick (Talk) 10:35, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]