User talk:ST11/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Speedy deletion nomination of David Phelps (baseball)

A tag has been placed on David Phelps (baseball) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding{{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note onthe talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged forspeedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these adminsto request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. --Non-Dropframe _talk 01:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Eric Wordekemper

I have nominated Eric Wordekemper, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Wordekemper. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Muboshgu (talk) 04:54, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Editor review

I did a quick editor review of you here. Thanks.VictorianMutant (talk) 23:41, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review

This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 12 November 2010 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding<!--noautoarchive--> to the review page will prevent further automated actions.AnomieBOT⚡ 02:46, 9 November 2010 (UTC)