User talk:SRJohnson

Welcome!

Hello, SRJohnson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

--

The topic of Anti-Mormonism is controversial, but that in and of itself doesn't make an article POV. WP:NPOV points out that an article can have POV but still be NPOV. The question is if one POV is presented in an unbalanced manner.

The normal procedure, if you think an article is POV is to add a tag like you did to Anti-Mormonism, but then to create a discussion topic on the talk page explaining why you think the article has unbalanced POV. Since nothing appeared on the talk page, your POV tag has been removed. If you believe that the article really is POV, then you are encouraged to explain your reasons on the talk page and, if a resolution seems unlikely, you are justified to add the POV tag to the article. -- wrp103 (Bill Pringle) ^(Talk) 19:57, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possible COI?

Are you an employee of, or volunteer for, the Living Hope Christian Fellowship &/or Shield and Refuge Ministry? If so you may want to read WP:COI regarding your contributions to Polygamy: What Love Is This?. -- 208.81.184.4 (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Unveiling Grace

The article Unveiling Grace has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable film lacking GHit and GNEWS of substance. WP:NOTFILM.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ttonyb (talk) 04:17, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Unveiling Grace for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Unveiling Grace is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unveiling Grace until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ttonyb (talk) 05:49, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Unveiling Grace, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. ttonyb (talk) 05:51, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]