User talk:SPresley

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, SPresley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 12:26, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adding external links

Hello! I must ask you not to advertise for your own website on Wikipedia articles. It is considered bad practice and all such attempts will be reverted. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 12:26, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Knlfb.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Knlfb.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:52, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Childs.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Childs.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:47, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Individualist feminism

Dr. Presley:

I updated the individualist feminism page. I believe the page looks a lot cleaner now. Hopefully you'll agree that these are improvements.

Sincerely,
Alex Peak

Allixpeeke (talk) 03:50, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Liberty

I was under the impression that the only significant difference between mutualism and anarcho-capitalism is that the mutualists accepted the labour theory of value whereas we typically prefer the subjective theory of value. Given that Tucker and others, if I am correct, advocated the labour theory, I presumed it to be correct to label Liberty mutualist. Feel free to change that.

Before I changed it to read "mutualist," it said "anti-capitalist." Since what-is-and-is-not capitalism can be debatable (and indeed has been the subject of debate for a long time) and since the definition of capitalism is not even pertinent to the definition of what-is-and-is-not libertarian feminism, I figured the removal of the phrase "anti-capitalist" was in order.

Coincidentally, would it be incorrect in your opinion to say that both mutualism and anarcho-capitalism are subcategories of individualist anarchism; or that the term "individualist anarchism" is synonymous with "market anarchism" and with "voluntaryism"? I ask only because, if there is some substantial difference, I cannot as of yet determine what that difference is.

Yours truly,

Alex Peak

Allixpeeke (talk) 07:07, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sharon Presley! Carol Moore, formerly of NYC and LA, been in DC for last 20 years. Been editing wikipedia for a year; just about past the addiction phase :-) Today noticed how bad the Individualist_feminism article is! (unsourced, confusing, lacking in much info.) Like I say, so many crappy libertarian articles, so little time to fix them up. Of course what's really frustrating is one fixes up an article and some idiot comes along and messes it up in their own silly way, but with enough knowledge of WIKI lingo to make it not worth fighting with them. Well, one does what one can! http://carolmoore.net/ http://secession.net Carol Moore 06:07, 13 December 2007 (UTC)User:Carolmooredc User talk:Carolmooredc

Question

Hello SPresley, are you the same Sharon Presley who founded Laissez Faire Books?--Cailil ^talk 15:44, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your reply Sharon. This is really a formality as I'm sure you know about WP:COI and the possibility of a "conflict of interest" in you writing an article about a group/business/organization that you are involved with or run. I did not want to use the {{Uw-coi}} becuase some people think it sounds accusatory and I am not accusing you of anything. I just want to remind you what site policy describes as a conflict of interest:

editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

You could take a look at Wikipedia:Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. You are probably already aware of this so if you do already have this information please disregard this post--Cailil ^talk 16:35, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Laissez Faire Books

Please read our guidelines on what constitute reliable sources for Wikipedia articles. Counter-intuitive as it may seem, personal reminiscences and the like are not acceptable sources, due to a lack of verifiability. --Orange Mike | Talk 16:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Amr silo.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:54, 24 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Andrea Millen Rich and a pile of books.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Andrea Millen Rich and a pile of books.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:44, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Knlfb3.jpg

The file File:Knlfb3.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:John sharon.jpg

The file File:John sharon.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Andrea Millen Rich and a pile of books.gif

The file File:Andrea Millen Rich and a pile of books.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned low-resolution file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 09:06, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]