User talk:SMITHOPSIS

Welcome!

Hello, SMITHOPSIS, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Khr:, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Sjö (talk) 14:59, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Khr:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Sjö (talk) 14:59, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arandpur

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Arandpur, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Arundu. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:33, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that if you want to move a page, you have to use a move tool that's available to registered user that have been editing for some time (so called "autoconfirmed users"). If you copy the text to a new article, like you did, you lose the article history and the contributors to the article aren't properly recognized. If you are not an autoconfirmed user you can request a page move at Wikipedia:Requested moves. You can find more information at Wikipedia:Moving a page. I will revert you changes for now. Sjö (talk) 07:55, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Caution for unexplained seemingly POV/selective removal of both mention of certain languages and references in the article. Thomas.W ^talk 15:52, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:ویکیپیڈیا زبانیں

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Thomas.W ^talk 15:53, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Arundu a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Cut-and-paste-move repair holding pen. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:39, 19 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Thomas.W ^talk 12:18, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Warning for unsourced and unexplained edits on multiple articles, edits that among other things make unsourced and unexplained changes to what languages are spoken in the area. Thomas.W ^talk 12:23, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Booni. Not only did you remove large portions of the article, but the items you changed don't even tie to the sources you cited for the new information. You need to work in smaller chunks, explain your changes, and make sure your changes agree to the sources you cite. —C.Fred (talk) 14:39, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: We can add Chitral to the final warning since he made the exact same type of edits there (before the final warning was given), removing information about languages spoken in the area and adding climate data that do not match the data in the reference given. Thomas.W ^talk 15:14, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Booni. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. You just got blocked for disruption and edit warring at this and other articles on related topics, and you're right back after the expiration of your block? I strongly suggest you refrain from editing the article and discuss your proposed changes at the article talk page(s) instead. —C.Fred (talk) 14:30, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Arandu. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 15:38, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 21:12, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Arandu

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Arandu. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Arundu. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Arundu – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:49, 22 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SMITHOPSIS (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am block due to i revert some edits on Buni article i am sorry i will never do this again give me a chance please kindly accept my unblock request i shall be thankful to you if you will unblock me

Decline reason:

To have your account unblocked, you're going to need to tell us your understanding of why you were blocked, why your edits were inappropriate, and what you will be doing in the future to be a productive member of the project. only (talk) 14:32, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Only: This user account is a blocked sock of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Najaf_ali_bhayo (see 4 May 2015), who obviously feels he's being hindered by the range blocks that have been made, since he has made one unblock request after the other lately, from both old sock accounts and blocked IPs... Thomas.W ^talk 14:44, 26 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]