User talk:SMG055

September 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 00:03, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

re: Article Sarah Michelle Gellar

It has nothing to do with claiming ownership of articles (as there is no ownership!), but more like manual of style and guidelines set by Wikipedia. I won't revert your edit again for now, as I would violate the 3RR rule (which you just did, by the way). I realise English is not your first language, but please, PLEASE keep in mind that reverts are made for a reason, and pay attention to the edit summary. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 01:10, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Jennifer GarnerS2009.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Jennifer GarnerS2009.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 20:26, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinitely blocked

Hello. You've been indefinitely blocked for bad file uploads. In particular, File:Jennifer GarnerS2009.jpg appears to be an attempt to upload a copyright violation under the guise of OTRS verification. It's my understanding that you have had similar issues at Commons. Please stop this behavior. Thank you. --MZMcBride (talk) 23:46, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to The Return (2006 film). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Garda40 (talk) 19:37, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SMG055 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Erzsébet Báthory_{(talk|contr.)} 04:13, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Valentine'sdayposter.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Valentine'sdayposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:47, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]