User talk:SMC/Archive 2
Diamond dust
[edit]Always check the history before suggesting a speedy :-) Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 08:49, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
- Aagh, sorry man. SMC 10:56, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
New userboxes
[edit]Per the terms of the German userbox solution new userboxes should not be created in template space. Please read up on the current practices. That page has instructions on how to properly create userfied userboxes. --Cyde Weys 20:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Justice Marcus Einfeld
[edit]Plese delete the Justice Marcus Einfeld page. It is a duplicate of the Marcus Einfeld page. I have moved all the material to the Marcus einfeld page.
- I've setup a redirect for that page. SMC 09:29, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
OZtion
[edit]In response to your question on why I marked OZtion with the prod tag: I based it strictly on the WP:CORP guideline, which reads in part:
The company or corporation has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the company or corporation itself.
The one external link on the OZtion page is a press release that came directly from the company.
As far as the comparison to uBid: uBid is at least publicly traded (although on the low-tier OTCBB)
All this said, while I think I had good reason to add the tag, you certainly had good reason to assert notability; it would just be nice to see some evidence of notability on the page itself.
sincerely, 68.173.33.81 16 October 2006
84.58.21.91
[edit]I brought some order to the page, you removed content! Check again the history.
- very sorry; thanks for letting me know :) SMC 08:23, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
72.81.90.244
[edit]if mines deleted why isnt the other one?
- You have vandalized a couple of pages by now; what are you asking? SMC 08:33, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
209.115.219.30
[edit]havent you watched her movies, she obiviously does —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.115.219.30 (talk • contribs)
- No, I haven't, and I probably don't want to anyway. It's not encyclopaedic therefore I reverted your edit. SMC 05:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- arent facts encyapdedic or however you spell it —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.115.219.30 (talk • contribs)
- Encyclopaedic, and even though it is a fact, it's not relevant. "She swallows lots of cum" or whatever you said is unlikely to end up in a published book version because it simply isnt relevant. Its not a useful fact and it looks more like (and probably is) vandalism than anything else. SMC 05:50, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- LOL SHE put it in HER book ABOUT HERSELF, so its in a book, anyway you the man around here so I guess its your call —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 209.115.219.30 (talk • contribs) 21 October, 2006.
- It's not useful to us. Other articles such as Lacey Duvalle don't state "she swallows lots of cum!" even if she apparently does, because they are not important. If you want to take it up elsewhere you can do so with a sysop. SMC 05:56, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- meh its not that important to me, i figured if she said it aboout her life then wy not put it on there, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.115.219.30 (talk • contribs)
- We encourage contributions; see the welcome message I put on your talk page for more. Regards, SMC 06:11, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey
[edit]what iam adding is fact.what u r doing to me is vandalism and misuse of ur power.Be humane.After all u r not god.Know facts before reverting edits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.17.116.104 (talk • contribs)
- No, it is not misuse of my perceived "power". You added completely random information to that article. Given that you have been warned in the past about vandalism and page blanking to that very same article, a test2 vandal warning template was given. Please add only useful factual information. SMC 07:54, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Re: Regarding edit to Car dealership
[edit]> Usually I'd just subst a vandal template in here, but you seem to have been here a long while.
> Why did you add the "dubious reputation" edit despite the fact that it's vandalism (and not
> NPOV).?SMC 09:04, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- Uhh, did you read the automobile salesman article (which I haven't touched the content of)? I was merely reprising the gist of that article. But have it your way, I've restored the wlink without further comment. Wasted Time R 13:15, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- your edit sounded a lot like vandalism. and no i didn't, but saying they have a "dubious" reputation is hardly NPOV, is it (even if its mostly true)? SMC 23:41, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- just read the other article, "mixed reputation" is a little more subtle then "dubious". shrugs, I guess you could restore it provided you don't make it look so close to vandalism/NPOV violation. rgds, SMC 23:41, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
- your edit sounded a lot like vandalism. and no i didn't, but saying they have a "dubious" reputation is hardly NPOV, is it (even if its mostly true)? SMC 23:41, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 23rd.
[edit]
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 43 | 23 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
| Report from the Finnish Wikipedia | News and notes: Donation currencies added, milestones |
| Wikipedia in the news | Features and admins |
| The Report on Lengthy Litigation |
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:32, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
211.29.31.124
[edit]hi!
you reverted an edit on the page http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Union_Banking_Corporation
i have put comments in the discussion page ... the dates of auschwitzI and II opening do seem fairly clear.
i understand it is a controversial issue ... please monitor it so that innapropriate edits are not made ... and let the truth through. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 211.29.31.214 (talk • contribs)
- Sorry, looked rather like vandalism. Will be more careful in future with the datings ;p SMC 23:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for October 30th.
[edit]|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 44 | 30 October 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
Vandalism
[edit]No problem, glad I could help and thank you for taking the time to say thanks! Mkdw 07:11, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 6th.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 45 | 6 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 13th.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 46 | 13 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 20th.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 47 | 20 November 2006 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 06:46, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Signpost updated for November 27th.
[edit] |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 2, Issue 48 | 27 November 2006 | [[Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/About|Ab |